Bibtex-Export

 

@article{ Sykes2016,
 title = {Aftermath: the consequences of the result of the 2016 EU referendum for heritage conservation in the United Kingdom},
 author = {Sykes, Olivier and Ludwig, Carol},
 journal = {Town Planning Review},
 number = {6},
 pages = {619-625},
 volume = {87},
 year = {2016},
 issn = {1478-341X},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.41},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74842-6},
 abstract = {In June 2016 a referendum was held in the UK on membership of the European Union.  
Two of the territories of the UK, England and Wales voted to leave the EU whilst two, 
Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain. The overall result was a narrow UK vote 
to leave the EU. Perhaps the one thing that all sides in a now deeply divided state can 
agree on is that the decision to leave the EU is a momentous one. Internally the position 
of Scotland and Northern Ireland within the UK is a key issue. In England the status and 
role of London and other major cities (which also mostly voted to remain in the EU) in 
relation to other regions, is also a matter of debate (BBC News, 2016). Less attention has 
been given to the many and varied relationships that local authorities have developed 
with the EU since the UK joined the then EEC in the 1970s. The withdrawal will impact 
diverse areas of their work – for example, experts predict it will lead to a hollowing out 
of environmental protection (Travers, 2016). How it will affect the heritage sector 
however, has received scant attention in the referendum campaign and since the result. 
This Viewpoint provides some reflections on this issue.},
 keywords = {Volksentscheid; referendum; EU; EU; Großbritannien; Great Britain; Denkmal; monument; Denkmalschutz; monument protection; Naturschutz; conservation}}