Diese Seite wird derzeit technisch überarbeitet. Es kann dabei vorübergehend zu längeren Ladezeiten kommen. Wir bitten, eventuelle Unannehmlichkeiten zu entschuldigen und danken für Ihr Verständnis.
Success and failure in narrowing the disability employment gap: comparing levels and trends across Europe 2002-2014
[journal article]
dc.contributor.author | Geiger, Ben Baumberg | de |
dc.contributor.author | Wel, Kjetil A. van der | de |
dc.contributor.author | Tøge, Anne Grete | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-10T08:07:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-10T08:07:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2458 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73575 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: International comparisons of the disability employment gap are an important driver of policy change. However, previous comparisons have used the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), despite known comparability issues. We present new results from the higher-quality European Social Survey (ESS), compare these to EU-SILC and the EU Labour Force Survey (EU-LFS), and also examine trends in the disability employment gap in Europe over the financial crisis for the first time. Methods: For cross-sectional comparisons of 25 countries, we use micro-data for ESS and EU-SILC for 2012 and compare these to published EU-LFS 2011 estimates. For trend analyses, we use seven biannual waves of ESS (2002-2014) with a total sample size of 182,195, and annual waves of EU-SILC (2004-2014) with a total sample size of 2,412,791. Results: (i) Cross-sectional: countries that have smaller disability employment gaps in one survey tend to have smaller gaps in the other surveys. Nevertheless, there are some countries that perform badly on the lower-quality surveys but better in the higher-quality ESS. (ii) Trends: the disability employment gap appears to have declined in ESS by 4.9%, while no trend is observed in EU-SILC - but this has come alongside a rise in disability in ESS. Conclusions: There is a need for investment in disability measures that are more comparable over time/space. Nevertheless, it is clear to policymakers there are some countries that do consistently well across surveys and measures (Switzerland), and others that do badly (Hungary). | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Wirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Economics | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social problems and services | en |
dc.subject.other | EU-SILC; EU-LFS; ESS | de |
dc.title | Success and failure in narrowing the disability employment gap: comparing levels and trends across Europe 2002-2014 | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | BMC Public Health | |
dc.source.volume | 17 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | |
dc.source.issue | 928 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Arbeitsmarktforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Labor Market Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | soziale Probleme | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Social Problems | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Beschäftigung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | employment | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Behinderung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | disability | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Beschäftigungsentwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | employment trend | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Gleichstellung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | affirmative action | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Quote | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | quota | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038718 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038005 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036416 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041441 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045798 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036360 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1-7 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20101 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20500 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2013 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 330 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 360 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4938-8 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Arbeitsmarktforschung
Labor Market Research -
soziale Probleme
Social Problems