Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorOkafor, Samuelde
dc.contributor.authorOnu, Janefrances C.de
dc.contributor.authorNwaeze, Vivian C.de
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T09:45:02Z
dc.date.available2021-05-19T09:45:02Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/73125
dc.description.abstractAmong other things, fertility control in Nigeria may not be feasible without recourse to socioeconomic issues such as micro-occupation classification and dominant family cultural traditions facing women and their relationship to fertility behaviour. Rural small-scale women farmers are a relatively closed group with some uniqueness for the understanding of the value of children (VOC) in socioeconomic and cultural contexts and its relationship with fertility behaviour in developing nations. This study, guided by the VOC model, focuses on determining factors for preference for family size (0-4 children) among rural small-scale women farmers in Eha-Amufun in Enugu state. 200 married women (mean age = 33.9; mean age at marriage = 24.5) from 20 agricultural co-operative societies were selected for the study. The study adopted a survey and quantitative research design. Besides the sociodemographic information of the study participants, the study elicited from the respondents information on their choice of family size, the connection of family size with their occupation and the circumstances surrounding son preference and son adoption in the family and rural contexts. The collected data were analysed using the ordinal logistic regression model. The findings show that economic independence, son preference and male child adoption negates limiting family sizes to 0-4 (p<.05) however, age, formal education, children as source of labour and economic independence were positively correlated with the desire for a family size of 4 children and above. In view of the limitations of the study and the ability of the VOC model to unveil spurious factors for fertility behaviour among women, there is a need for comparative studies of rural closed groups in developing nations and their fertility behaviour.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherClosed group; Desired family size; Rural small-scale farmers; Fertility control; VOC; Women's rolesde
dc.titleRural Small-Scale Women Farmers and Preference for Family Size in South-East Nigeriade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume46de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.classozFamiliensoziologie, Sexualsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozFamily Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavioren
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozBauerde
dc.subject.thesozpeasanten
dc.subject.thesozKleinbetriebde
dc.subject.thesozsmall businessen
dc.subject.thesozFamiliengrößede
dc.subject.thesozfamily sizeen
dc.subject.thesozFruchtbarkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertilityen
dc.subject.thesozFamilienplanungde
dc.subject.thesozfamily planningen
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozGeschlechtsrollede
dc.subject.thesozgender roleen
dc.subject.thesozländlicher Raumde
dc.subject.thesozrural areaen
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungslandde
dc.subject.thesozdeveloping countryen
dc.subject.thesozNigeriade
dc.subject.thesozNigeriaen
dc.subject.thesozWestafrikade
dc.subject.thesozWest Africaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:bib-cpos-2021-02en3de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10037693
internal.identifier.thesoz10038864
internal.identifier.thesoz10043280
internal.identifier.thesoz10044407
internal.identifier.thesoz10043302
internal.identifier.thesoz10053635
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10044127
internal.identifier.thesoz10034789
internal.identifier.thesoz10034610
internal.identifier.thesoz10035654
internal.identifier.thesoz10034685
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo35-68de
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.classoz10209
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-02de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record