Show simple item record

[phd thesis]

dc.contributor.authorDrefs, Inesde
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T08:06:05Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T08:06:05Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-945681-07-0de
dc.identifier.issn2198-7610de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72646
dc.description.abstractThe value of online user comments is a much-debated issue. In journalism, the newly arising possibility for readers and viewers to easily and instantaneously share their views on journalistic output was welcomed at first. Compared to the conventional letter to the editor it represented a democratized form of audience feedback. News organizations increased their presence in the social web and gained more and more experience with user comments. Over time, however, discontent towards the quality of online user comments seemed to grow. But what is the responsibility of journalism in this respect? How do news organizations use the social web? How do they handle online user comments? To what extent do they tap the dialogical potential of the social web for facilitating exchange and understanding between different viewpoints? This study pursues these questions by investigating the case of Germany’s international public service broadcaster Deutsche Welle with its explicit dialogical mandate. It provides an in-depth examination of a transition period in which the news organization is grappling with its self-conception as a serious news provider in the casual social web environment, in which social media editors struggle for recognition from their established colleagues, and in which "stepping back and letting the discussion unfold on its own" serves as a strategy to avoid censorship accusations from users. Based on a specially developed analytical grid the study offers a democracy-theoretical evaluation of the user comments and their handling by Deutsche Welle.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherUser Comments; Social Web; YouTube; Social Web Practices; Document analysisde
dc.titleA Chance for Dialogical Journalism? Social Web Practices and Handling of User Comments at Deutsche Wellede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesDigital Communication Research
dc.subject.classozKommunikatorforschung, Journalismusde
dc.subject.classozCommunicator Research, Journalismen
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.thesozDigitale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozdigital mediaen
dc.subject.thesozJournalismusde
dc.subject.thesozjournalismen
dc.subject.thesozDeutsche Wellede
dc.subject.thesozDeutsche Welleen
dc.subject.thesozDialogde
dc.subject.thesozdialogueen
dc.subject.thesozSozialer Dialogde
dc.subject.thesozsocial dialogueen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozDiskursde
dc.subject.thesozdiscourseen
dc.subject.thesozInternetde
dc.subject.thesozInterneten
dc.subject.thesozSoziale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozsocial mediaen
dc.subject.thesozÖffentlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozthe publicen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratietheoriede
dc.subject.thesoztheory of democracyen
dc.subject.thesozFallstudiede
dc.subject.thesozcase studyen
dc.subject.thesozFacebookde
dc.subject.thesozfacebooken
dc.subject.thesozInhaltsanalysede
dc.subject.thesozcontent analysisen
dc.subject.thesozExpertenbefragungde
dc.subject.thesozexpert surveyen
dc.subject.thesozqualitatives Interviewde
dc.subject.thesozqualitative interviewen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10083753
internal.identifier.thesoz10034699
internal.identifier.thesoz10040837
internal.identifier.thesoz10040996
internal.identifier.thesoz10043842
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10041158
internal.identifier.thesoz10040528
internal.identifier.thesoz10094228
internal.identifier.thesoz10051413
internal.identifier.thesoz10091460
internal.identifier.thesoz10043220
internal.identifier.thesoz10085689
internal.identifier.thesoz10035488
internal.identifier.thesoz10040656
internal.identifier.thesoz10047977
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentDissertationde
dc.type.documentphd thesisen
dc.type.documentMonographiede
dc.type.documentmonographen
dc.source.pageinfo400de
internal.identifier.classoz1080406
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.document9
internal.identifier.document20
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v7.0de
dc.description.pubstatusErstveröffentlichungde
dc.description.pubstatusPrimary Publicationen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus5
internal.identifier.review1
internal.identifier.series900
dc.subject.classhort10800de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_3 Page_15 Page_19 Page_402 Page_406 Page_407
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record