Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorDannecker, Petrade
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T07:19:28Z
dc.date.available2021-04-23T07:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1999-253Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72627
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the paper is to discuss and to reflect on the experiences and challenges encountered during the North-South capacity building project on transdisciplinarity, KNOTS (Fostering Multi-Lateral Knowledge Networks of Transdisciplinary Studies to Tackle Global Challenges), which was financed by the EU through the Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education program. Despite the large body of literature on transdisciplinary approaches and projects, not many studies exist that discuss both the political and the power dimensions within transdisciplinary endeavors, especially not from a social science perspective. Based on the experiences, challenges, and progress over the course of the project, I will analyze how power relations influenced and structured KNOTS. I argue that the success of transdisciplinary North-South collaborations depends very much on awareness of power hierarchies, reflexivity, and positionality as well as different understandings of knowledge. Although differences will be highlighted regarding, for example, the aims of transdisciplinarity or the role of different understandings of science and knowledge, the paper does not aim to increase skepticism regarding transdisciplinarity. Instead, the intent of the reflections is to increase awareness of the influences of power structures and relations in transdisciplinarity projects, especially North-South collaboration projects.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCollaboration; Knowledge; North-South; Power Structures; Transdisciplinarityde
dc.titleTransdisciplinarity 'Meets' Power Structures: Challenges and Experiences of a Capacity Building Project on Transdisciplinarityde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/article/view/3602/5291de
dc.source.journalASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryAUT
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozWissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technologyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo175-192de
internal.identifier.classoz10220
internal.identifier.journal5
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicNegotiating Transdisciplinarityde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0042de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence19
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://aseas.univie.ac.at/index.php/aseas/oai/@@oai:journals.univie.ac.at:article/3602
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record