Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorEvans, Jamesde
dc.contributor.authorVácha, Tomášde
dc.contributor.authorKok, Henkde
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Kellyde
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T11:56:00Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T11:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72484
dc.description.abstractCities must change rapidly to address a range of sustainability challenges. While urban experimentation has prospered as a framework for innovation, it has struggled to stimulate broader transformation. We offer a novel contribution to this debate by focusing on what municipalities learn from experimentation and how this drives organisational change. The practicalities of how municipalities learn and change has received relatively little attention, despite the recognised importance of learning within the literature on urban experiments and the central role of municipalities in enabling urban transformation. We address this research gap, drawing on four years of in-depth research coproduced with European municipal project coordinators responsible for designing and implementing the largest urban research and innovation projects ever undertaken. This cohort of professionals plays a critical role in urban experimentation and transformation, funnelling billions of Euros into trials of new solutions to urban challenges and coordinating large public-private partnerships to deliver them. For our respondents, learning how to experiment more effectively and embedding these lessons into their organisations was the most important outcome of these projects. We develop the novel concept of process learning to capture the importance of experimentation in driving organisational change. Process learning is significant because it offers a new way to understand the relationship between experimentation and urban transformation and should form the focus of innovation projects that seek to prompt broader urban transformation, rather than technical performance. We conclude by identifying implications for urban planning and innovation funding.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.otherexperimentation; innovation; municipalities; process learning; urban transformationde
dc.titleHow Cities Learn: From Experimentation to Transformationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3545de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo171-182de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicUrban Planning by Experimentde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3545de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3545
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede
ssoar.doi.registrationtruede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record