SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(1.379Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-72255-8

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

A restrained embrace: South Korea's response to Germany's Indo-Pacific strategey

[comment]

Ballbach, Eric J.
Morazzini, Laura

Corporate Editor
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit

Abstract

While the adoption of the Policy Guidelines for the Indo-Pacific (PGIP or Guidelines) by the Federal Foreign Office of Germany in September 2020 has raised significant interest among observers, much more attention needs to be paid to the role and response of the designated "core partners" in the reg... view more

While the adoption of the Policy Guidelines for the Indo-Pacific (PGIP or Guidelines) by the Federal Foreign Office of Germany in September 2020 has raised significant interest among observers, much more attention needs to be paid to the role and response of the designated "core partners" in the region. The example of South Korea is especially important in this regard. On the one hand, there is much yet untapped potential to increase cooperation, given the overlaps in Berlin's and Seoul's Indo-Pacific strategies. On the other hand, South Korea's restrained reaction to the Guide­lines both reflects the geopolitical dilemma within which some regional partners are operating and foreshadows potential implementation challenges. (author's abstract)... view less

Classification
International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy

Free Keywords
Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Bilaterale internationale Beziehungen; Südkorea; Indopazifik; Regionale internationale Prozesse und Tendenzen; Bestimmungsfaktoren der Außenpolitik; Sicherheitsfaktoren der Außenpolitik; Geopolitische Faktoren; Bedrohungsvorstellungen (Sicherheitspolitik); Nuklearpolitik; Nordkorea; Volksrepublik China; Politisch-diplomatische Maßnahmen; Außenpolitische Initiative; Vorschlag/Plan für internationale Zusammenarbeit; Staatlicher internationaler Akteur; Sicherheitsmaßnahmen; Sicherheitspartnerschaft; Sicherheitspolitische Interessen außerhalb von Bündnisterritorien; Europäische Union

Document language
English

Publication Year
2021

City
Berlin

Page/Pages
7 p.

Series
SWP Comment, 13/2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18449/2021C13

ISSN
1861-1761

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.