Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKushnir, Оksanade
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T12:18:49Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T12:18:49Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2504-5571de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71916
dc.description.abstractThis paper is devoted to studies of communication process peculiarities, role of "negotiators" in transdisciplinary studies and also interaction processes between science and practice on an example of an empirical case. Based on the conducted analysis, a hypothesis has been confirmed that effective realization of the transdisciplinary approach is grounded on effective communication, and factors, worth attention for successful realization of research aims in transdisciplinary projects have been determined: balance of power relations between participants of transdisciplinary studies, choice of mediators' groups, change of initial instructions of scientists, cultural differences and their influence on general organization of processes, choice of communication types and forms. A necessity to construct a communicative strategy of a transdisciplinary project, forming a common field for effective interaction, has been determined; at that there must be taken into account group development stages, key topics of communication and its success indicators. It has been proved, that communication management is a necessary element of transdisciplinary studies organization and conduction. For improving communication quantity and quality, it is necessary for scientists and stakeholders to take equal responsibility and to participate in decision making.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcBildung und Erziehungde
dc.subject.ddcEducationen
dc.titleRole and importance of communication in transdisciplinary research managementde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEUREKA: Social and Humanities
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozForschung, Forschungsorganisationde
dc.subject.classozResearch, Research Organizationen
dc.subject.thesozForschungspraxisde
dc.subject.thesozresearch practiceen
dc.subject.thesozForschungsprozessde
dc.subject.thesozresearch processen
dc.subject.thesozTransdisziplinaritätde
dc.subject.thesoztransdisciplinaryen
dc.subject.thesozStakeholderde
dc.subject.thesozstakeholderen
dc.subject.thesozMediationde
dc.subject.thesozmediationen
dc.subject.thesozInteraktionde
dc.subject.thesozinteractionen
dc.subject.thesozWissenschaftde
dc.subject.thesozscienceen
dc.subject.thesozPraxisde
dc.subject.thesozpracticeen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozcommunicationen
dc.subject.thesozEntscheidungsfindungde
dc.subject.thesozdecision makingen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10043965
internal.identifier.thesoz10043972
internal.identifier.thesoz10075540
internal.identifier.thesoz10079216
internal.identifier.thesoz10049472
internal.identifier.thesoz10046098
internal.identifier.thesoz10062479
internal.identifier.thesoz10038577
internal.identifier.thesoz10035149
internal.identifier.thesoz10042187
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo47-54de
internal.identifier.classoz10604
internal.identifier.journal1727
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc370
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2021.001626de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record