Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorSchüller, Margotde
dc.contributor.authorSchüler-Zhou, Yunde
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T15:38:06Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T15:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn1862-359Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71026
dc.description.abstractChina's rise as a global technology power is challenging United States supremacy in many ways. Although the relationship between the US and China has seen its ups and downs over the years, it is only since 2017 that the US's relations with China have shifted from engagement to confrontation. Little change can be expected under the Joe Biden presidency. Europe is caught in the crossfire of this conflict, and needs to design its own technology policy. The US still has a leading position globally in major key technologies, but China's success in catching up and its growing competitiveness in emerging technologies is challenging the US's leadership role. In order to contain China's technological rise, perceived as a threat to its national economy and its security, the US government under President Donald Trump had taken specific policy measures - including screening Chinese investment in the US, new export restrictions, and limiting knowledge transfer to China. These restrictions have disrupted the technology supply chains of Chinese companies, but spurred their efforts to improve research and technology performance at the same time. European companies have been concerned about the interruption of global supply chains due to the US-China tech "Cold War," as well as worried about the associated costs of dealing with two separate technology blocs in the future. The incoming US government aspires to closer cooperation with its traditional allies on issues related to its "strategic competition" with China. The European Union has to decide whether to join a US-led anti-China tech alliance or design an independent China tech policy instead. As both the US and China are of similar economic importance to the EU, taking sides in the geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers will come at a high cost for Europe - and especially for European companies. The EU should rely more on its counterbalancing power and aim at higher tech sovereignty, while striving for multilateral, open, and rule-based technological cooperation.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.titleUnited States-China Decoupling: Time for European Tech Sovereigntyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Asien
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozEUde
dc.subject.thesozEUen
dc.subject.thesozTechnologiede
dc.subject.thesoztechnologyen
dc.subject.thesozHandelde
dc.subject.thesozcommerceen
dc.subject.thesozAußenhandelde
dc.subject.thesozforeign tradeen
dc.subject.thesozAußenhandelspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozexport policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Wettbewerbde
dc.subject.thesozinternational competitionen
dc.subject.thesozKonfliktde
dc.subject.thesozconflicten
dc.subject.thesozTechnologiepolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpolicy on technologyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71026-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10041441
internal.identifier.thesoz10035297
internal.identifier.thesoz10037339
internal.identifier.thesoz10037337
internal.identifier.thesoz10037352
internal.identifier.thesoz10047903
internal.identifier.thesoz10036275
internal.identifier.thesoz10043962
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo12de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor147
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series284
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record