SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(296.9Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71022-4

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Uma análise da terceira seção da obra 'Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes'

An analysis of the third section of the book 'Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals'
[journal article]

Orben, Douglas João

Abstract

This article addresses the issue discussed on the third section of the book Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, more precisely the question regarding the a priorisynthetic validity of the categorical imperative in determining the human will. Although the moral law is universally recognize... view more

This article addresses the issue discussed on the third section of the book Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, more precisely the question regarding the a priorisynthetic validity of the categorical imperative in determining the human will. Although the moral law is universally recognized by all rational beings, Kant needs to demonstrate its effectiveness with regard to the human will, which is empirically affected. Thus, the Kantian argumentative strategy revolves around an attempt to deduce the moral autonomy of the notion of transcendental freedom, which is impossible, because, in this context, there is still no way to prove the objective validity of such a concept. Despite the effort made by Kant, all the arguments raised here come up against the impossibility of knowing the scope of intelligibility, so that this question will only be carried out in the Critique of Practical Reason.... view less

Keywords
freedom; morality; Kant, I.; philosophy; metaphysics; act

Classification
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion

Free Keywords
Categorical imperative

Document language
Portuguese

Publication Year
2020

Page/Pages
p. 1-15

Journal
Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 20 (2020) 3

ISSN
2178-1036

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.