Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSutkutė, Rūtade
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T13:50:24Z
dc.date.available2020-12-16T13:50:24Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2504-5571de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/71010
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on how Roma communities are represented in the Lithuanian online media. The aim is to answer the question of how news about the Roma is embedded in the broader practices of neoliberalism and racist discourses. Representation of the Roma in the media is inseparable from constructivism, power and influence. Roma communities have little opportunity to make their voices heard in society, i.e., their voice is not heard or represented in the media. Political representation of the Roma is particularly important due to the weak opportunities to participate in the formulation and decision-making of certain political decisions, both in the national and international context. It is assumed, that the negative and even stereotypical portrayal of the Roma in the media encourages a negative public attitude towards this ethnic group and has an impact on the (in)successful integration of the Roma into society. The aim of the research is to find out how Roma are represented on the online news portals 15min.lt and Lrytas.lt and to reveal how stereotypes are formed in relation with this national minority. The following tasks are used to reveal the aim of the work: to present the history of the Roma and the problems of their identity, to analyze the concept of Romaphobia, to present the theory of social constructivism and the role of the media in shaping social reality; to perform a qualitative analysis of the content of the news portals 15min.lt and Lrytas.lt: comparing how Roma perceptions are formed on these news portals and how different groups of actors contribute to constructing and maintaining stereotypes in the media/society. The qualitative analysis of the content revealed that the information, provided in the media, aims to portray the Roma as a threat to public security and to the local population, who experience socio-economic exclusion, who have different values and are reluctant to integrate. However, Roma are not given the right to self-representation because the unilateral narrative of the event dominates and the audience for which the report is addressed is too homogeneous. Manifestations of Romaphobia are observed in the news portals' discourse. It can be assumed, that this creates a negative value orientation for readers, as Roma is perceived as an "undesirable" ethnic group in Lithuania. However, the Roma themselves do not have effective means to make heard their "voice" and participate in public life in order to challenge the dominant negative images.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherRomaphobia; Media Representation; Political Identity; Romani peoplede
dc.titleRepresentation of Roma in Lithuanian online media: 15min.lt and lrytas.lt case studiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEUREKA: Social and Humanities
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.subject.classozMigrationde
dc.subject.classozMigration, Sociology of Migrationen
dc.subject.thesozLitauende
dc.subject.thesozLithuaniaen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Mediende
dc.subject.thesozonline mediaen
dc.subject.thesozSinti und Romade
dc.subject.thesozgipsyen
dc.subject.thesozDiskursde
dc.subject.thesozdiscourseen
dc.subject.thesozStereotypde
dc.subject.thesozstereotypeen
dc.subject.thesozStigmatisierungde
dc.subject.thesozstigmatizationen
dc.subject.thesozethnische Gruppede
dc.subject.thesozethnic groupen
dc.subject.thesozMinderheitde
dc.subject.thesozminorityen
dc.subject.thesozExklusionde
dc.subject.thesozexclusionen
dc.subject.thesozFremdgruppede
dc.subject.thesozoutgroupen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037614
internal.identifier.thesoz10064820
internal.identifier.thesoz10062954
internal.identifier.thesoz10041158
internal.identifier.thesoz10041741
internal.identifier.thesoz10059362
internal.identifier.thesoz10039108
internal.identifier.thesoz10042827
internal.identifier.thesoz10063808
internal.identifier.thesoz10044323
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo18-34de
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.classoz10304
internal.identifier.journal1727
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2020.001529de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record