Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBerg, Sebastiande
dc.contributor.authorKönig, Timde
dc.contributor.authorKoster, Ann-Kathrinde
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T16:50:18Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T16:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70737
dc.description.abstractThe article contributes to the literature on the political use of hashtags. We argue that hashtag assemblages could be understood in the tradition of representing public opinion through datafication in the context of democratic politics. While traditional data-based epistemic practices like polls lead to the ‘passivation’ of citizens, in the digital constellation this tendency is currently challenged. In media like Twitter, hashtags serve as a technical operator to order the discursive fabrication of diverse publicly articulated opinions that manifest in the assemblage of tweets, algorithms and criticisms. We conceptualize such a critical public as an epistemic sensorium for dislocations based on the expression of experienced social imbalances and its political amplification. On the level of opinion formation, this constitutes a process of democratization, allowing for the expression of diverse opinions and issues even under singular hashtags. Despite this diversity, we see a strong tendency of publicly relevant actors such as news outlets to represent digital forms of opinion expression as unified movements. We argue that this tendency can partly be explained by the affordances of networked media, relating the process of objectification to the network position of the observer. We make this argument empirically plausible by applying methods of network analysis and topic modelling to a dataset of 196,987 tweets sampled via the hashtag #metwo that emerged in the German Twittersphere in the summer of 2018 and united a discourse concerned with racism and identity. In light of this data, we not only demonstrate the hashtag assemblage’s heterogeneity and potential for subaltern agency; we also make visible how hashtag assemblages as epistemic practices are inherently dynamic, distinguishing it from opinion polling through the limited observational capacities and active participation of the actors representing its claims within the hybrid media system.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.other#metwo; Twitter analysis; assemblages; big data; datafication; democracy; epistemic practices; hashtag; network analysis; topic modellingde
dc.titlePolitical Opinion Formation as Epistemic Practice: The Hashtag Assemblage of #metwode
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3164de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozMeinungsbildungde
dc.subject.thesozopinion formationen
dc.subject.thesozTwitterde
dc.subject.thesoztwitteren
dc.subject.thesozNetzwerkanalysede
dc.subject.thesoznetwork analysisen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozDiskursanalysede
dc.subject.thesozdiscourse analysisen
dc.subject.thesozRassismusde
dc.subject.thesozracismen
dc.subject.thesozIdentitätde
dc.subject.thesozidentityen
dc.subject.thesozAkteurde
dc.subject.thesozsocial actoren
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041758
internal.identifier.thesoz10094030
internal.identifier.thesoz10053147
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10080410
internal.identifier.thesoz10035797
internal.identifier.thesoz10046991
internal.identifier.thesoz10064198
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo84-95de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicThe Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Spherede
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3164de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3164
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record