dc.contributor.author | Kristensen, Marlene Paulin | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-24T08:37:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-24T08:37:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2803 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70693 | |
dc.description.abstract | Based on research conducted among EU border enforcement officials, this article embarks on a discussion about complicity and critical analysis within border and migration studies. The study of borders and migration in the context of the EU is a highly politicized issue, and several scholars have pointed out that critical research easily comes to serve into a “knowledge loop” (Hess, 2010), or play part in the proliferation of a "migration business" (Andersson, 2014). In this article, I will argue that in order to not reproduce the vocabulary or object-making of that which we study, we need to study processes of scale-making (Tsing, 2000) and emphasise the multiplicity of borders (Andersen & Sandberg, 2012). In the article, I therefore present three strategies for critical analysis: First, I suggest critically assessing the locations of fieldwork, and the ways in which these either mirror or distort dominant narratives about the borders of Europe. Secondly, I probe into the differences and similarities between the interlocutors’ and researchers’ objects of inquiry. Finally, I discuss the purpose of "being there", in the field, in relation to ethnographic knowledge production. I ask whether we might leave behind the idea of ethnography as evidence or revelations, and rather focus on ethnography as additions. In conclusion, I argue that instead of critical distance, we as scholars should nurture the capacity of critical complicity. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | border and migration studies | de |
dc.title | EU border officials and critical complicity: the politics of location and ethnographic knowledge as additions | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3314 | de |
dc.source.journal | Social Inclusion | |
dc.source.volume | 8 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | |
dc.source.issue | 4 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Migration | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Migration, Sociology of Migration | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Ethnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Ethnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociology | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Europapolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | European Politics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Grenzschutz | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | border protection | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Migration | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | migration | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Beamter | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | civil servant | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Staatsgrenze | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | national border | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ethnographie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | ethnography | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wissen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | knowledge | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Analyse | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | analysis | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kritik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | criticism | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041441 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040019 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034515 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037784 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044639 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042834 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035168 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034712 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043611 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 169-177 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10304 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10400 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10506 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 786 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Method as border: articulating "Inclusion/exclusion" as an academic concern in migration and border research in Europe | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3314 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3314 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |