Endnote export
%T Radical democracy and left populism after the squares: 'Social Movement' (Ukraine), Podemos (Spain), and the question of organization %A Kim, Seongcheol %J Contemporary Political Theory %N 2 %P 211-232 %V 19 %D 2020 %@ 1476-9336 %~ WZB %X This article begins with a theoretical tension. Radical democracy, in the joint work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, can be understood as a joint articulation of a post-foundational ontology of contingency and a politics of autonomy of ‘democratic struggles' within a hegemonic bloc as loci of antagonisms in their own right, while Laclau's theory of populism marks a shift from the autonomy of struggles to the representative function of the empty signifier as a constitutive dimension. This tension between a horizontal logic of autonomy and a vertical logic of representation comes to the fore not least in the manifold attempts to combine radical-democratic and (left-)populist practices in the wake of the ‘movements of the squares.’ This argument is illustrated empirically in the cases of two party projects situating themselves in contexts of social protest - 'Social Movement' in Ukraine and Podemos in Spain - both of which seek to combine a left-populist discursive strategy with some form of radical-democratic politics of autonomy, either by supporting local alliances independent from the party (Podemos) or by integrating trade union representatives into the organizational center, which in turn finds expression in a representative logic ('Social Movement'). %C USA %G en %9 Zeitschriftenartikel %W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org %~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info