dc.contributor.author | Braumann, Alfried | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-20T06:57:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-20T06:57:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-7635 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70192 | |
dc.description.abstract | In 2017–2018, Seattle-based Tech behemoth Amazon executed a highly publicised location-finding process for a $5 billion investment project, dubbed ‘HQ2’. Owing to the combination of high investment volume and the company’s unique public exposure, the HQ2 process is on course to becoming a basic yardstick for future foreign direct investment (FDI) projects all over the world. This article compiles the company’s previously unpublished site selection criteria and develops an evidence-based system of investment decision arguments which is employed to test the currently dominant approaches in location decision theory - behavioural, neoclassical, and institutional. Our results identify gaps vis-à-vis this emerging ‘Gold Standard’ and we propose the addition of a fourth, project-oriented approach to theory to fill the detected shortcomings. Furthermore, this system equips policymakers with a tool to evaluate their investment attraction strategies based on the decision criteria extracted from the HQ2 process. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Landscaping and area planning | en |
dc.subject.other | Amazon; HQ2; economic policy; foreign direct investment; impact assessment; local economic development; location decision; policy; urban development | de |
dc.title | Amazon’s HQ2 Site Selection Criteria: The New ‘Gold Standard’ in FDI Decision-Making | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3207 | de |
dc.source.journal | Urban Planning | |
dc.source.volume | 5 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Raumplanung und Regionalforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Area Development Planning, Regional Research | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 403-417 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20700 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 794 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 710 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Planning for Local Economic Development: Research into Policymaking and Practice | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.3207 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3207 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |