Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBedyński, Wojciechde
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T08:05:40Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T08:05:40Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2544-5502de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/69561
dc.description.abstractBlack Death, global plague of the 14th century deeply changed the society of Medieval Europe. This unexpected catastrophe killed from 30 to 60 per cent of the continent’s population remaining the most deadly of all known wars, epidemics or natural disasters up to date1. It was an impulse to a profound transformation of European society, religiosity and art that opened doors for the Renaissance. Time of the catastrophe had a clearly liminal character, well described in Boccaccio’s Decameron. It is far too early to predict the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the world in long-time perspective, as we know little about how and when the disaster will end, but mechanisms of the liminal period are already to be seen and can be described, so is the influence of the virus on global economy, mobility, culture. There are similarities even in human reactions -- from the hostility towards Asians (pogroms of Jews as a reaction to the Black Death) to "corona-parties" (similar to the plays described by Boccaccio).de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherpandemic; Black Death; mobility; social structure; religiosity; liminalityde
dc.titleLiminality: black death 700 years later; what lessons are for us from the medieval pandemic?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSociety Register
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryPOL
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozSozialgeschichte, historische Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.classozSocial History, Historical Social Researchen
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozhistorische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozhistorical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozsocial relationsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10034801
internal.identifier.thesoz10042812
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo129-144de
internal.identifier.classoz30302
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal1412
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc900
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.3.07de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record