Bibtex export
@book{ Rudloff2020, title = {Brexit: a pragmatic trade agreement? Time is tight but deal remains possible}, author = {Rudloff, Bettina and Schmieg, Evita}, year = {2020}, series = {SWP Comment}, pages = {8}, volume = {18/2020}, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit}, issn = {1861-1761}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.18449/2020C18}, urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68699-4}, abstract = {The negotiating mandates for the next round of Brexit talks are on the table. The European Union is making talks on a deal regulating EU/UK trade from 1 January 2021 conditional on reaching a fisheries agreement first - originally by July, although the precise timetable may be derailed by the corona crisis. The negotiating mandates diverge in significant respects: The European Union wants to safeguard its Single Market with its strong, shared regulation. That is also reflected in its recently published draft proposal for a trade deal. The United Kingdom seeks liberation from EU trade rules. These differences are substantial, and significant compromises will be needed if the talks are to be brought to a successful conclusion. Intelligent prioritisation and structuring could allow resolution of certain details to be postponed until a later date. (author's abstract)}, keywords = {EU; domestic market; third countries; Binnenmarkt; Fischerei; control; Akteur; Freihandel; free trade; international economic relations; Entwicklung; internationales Abkommen; social actor; development; political actor; europäische Integration; export policy; trend; European integration; EU; internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen; surveillance; Drittländer; Staatsgrenze; Außenhandelspolitik; Observation; Kontrolle; national border; Großbritannien; international agreement; Trend; politischer Akteur; Great Britain; fishery}}