dc.contributor.author | Shim, Jaemin | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-27T09:43:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-27T09:43:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2169-978X | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68626 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper investigates elite-level partisan differences along the socioeconomic dimension in three developed East Asian democracies - Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. On the one hand, the mainstream literature in welfare studies and party politics expects left- and right-leaning parties should vary significantly in utilizing social policy promises. On the other hand, the path dependency logic tells us that left-right difference should be found over particularistic benefits, such as agricultural subsidies or construction projects, considering that these were central means for right-leaning parties to maintain their power during the developmental state period in the three countries. Using an original bill-sponsorship data set between 1987 and 2012, we find that there has not been any substantial difference in the agenda setting of conventional social welfare bills between left- and right-wing government periods. However, a clear elective affinity can be observed between established right-wing parties and particularistic benefits. The paper shows that contextualizing key political actors' preferences can lead to a more systematic understanding of political dynamics behind the socioeconomic dimension in non-Anglo-European countries. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.title | Left is right and right is left? Partisan difference on social welfare and particularistic benefits in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy | |
dc.source.volume | 36 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Sozialpolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Social Policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Sozialpolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | social policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Richtung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political direction | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Pfadabhängigkeit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | path dependence | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Sponsoring | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | sponsoring | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Sozialökonomie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | social economics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Japan | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Japan | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Südkorea | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | South Korea | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Taiwan | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Taiwan | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ostasien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Far East | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Parteipolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | party politics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Rechte | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political right | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Linke | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political left | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68626-1 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GIGA | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036537 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054866 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10068133 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043662 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10058442 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048140 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049780 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043888 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036845 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054149 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054827 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10051240 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 25-41 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 11000 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1795 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.2 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
ssoar.wgl.collection | true | de |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |