Show simple item record

[other]

dc.contributor.authorGrebe, Jande
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T14:28:40Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16T14:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2014de
dc.identifier.issn2521-7836de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/64123
dc.description.abstractThe Global Militarisation Index (gmi) depicts the relative weight and importance of the military apparatus of one state in relation to its society as a whole. The update of the GMI 2014 is based on data from the year 2013 (i. e. the most recent year for which data has been available) and comprises 152 states. BICC’s GMI is supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (bmz). In the 2014 GMI, Israel, Singapore, Armenia, Syria, Russia, Cyprus, South Korea, Jordan, Greece and Azerbaijan (position 1 to 10) are amongst the ten countries with the highest levels of militarisation—three of which are situated in the Middle East, two in East Asia and the remaining five in Western and Eastern Europe. The high levels of militarisation in these countries are mostly the result of comprehensive arms purchases. The causes for the generally high levels of militarisation in the Middle East are manifold. They range from the defence of existing authoritarian regimes against possible internal adversaries to external conflicts and potential threats from the outside. All in all, one will have to assume that the level of militarisation in the region will remain high or will even increase. The neighbouring states Armenia (position 3) and Azerbaijan (position 10), both belonging to Europe, show very high levels of militarisation and have initiated major increases in their military expenditures over the past years. The high levels of militarisation in these two countries must, however, be seen in the overall context. Russia (position 5) delivers arms to both South Caucasian republics and has been pursuing a comprehensive military reform since 2008. Between 2009 and 2013, expenditures for equipment and procurement in European NATO states fell by more than US $9 billion. Still, some states show high levels of militarisation (Greece: 9, Estonia: 21, Turkey: 24, Bulgaria: 27, Portugal: 28). Singapore (position 2) and South Korea (position 7) are the two countries within East Asia that are amongst the most militarised countries. Singapore’s procurement efforts are a reaction to its many unresolved territorial issues, the importance of strategic waterways in the region and the Chinese anti-access / area denial strategy. South Korea’s high level of militarisation can be understood in the context of the ongoing state of war with North Korea, but also with unresolved territorial issues with Japan and China in the Yellow Sea.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherinternationale Verteidigung; Rüstungsplanung; Verteidigungsplanung; Verteidigungsausgaben; entwicklungspolitische Strategiede
dc.titleGlobal Militarisation Index 2014de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume2014de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBonnde
dc.subject.classozFriedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozPeace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policyen
dc.subject.thesozVerteidigungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozdefense policyen
dc.subject.thesozMilitarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozmilitarizationen
dc.subject.thesozRüstungde
dc.subject.thesozarmamentsen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Sicherheitde
dc.subject.thesozinternational securityen
dc.subject.thesozEuropade
dc.subject.thesozEuropeen
dc.subject.thesozAsiende
dc.subject.thesozAsiaen
dc.subject.thesozAfrikade
dc.subject.thesozAfricaen
dc.subject.thesozMilitärpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozmilitary policyen
dc.subject.thesozAusgabende
dc.subject.thesozexpendituresen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozsecurity policyen
dc.subject.thesozKonfliktde
dc.subject.thesozconflicten
dc.subject.thesozMilitärde
dc.subject.thesozmilitaryen
dc.subject.thesozNahostde
dc.subject.thesozMiddle Easten
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-64123-3
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0en
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034428
internal.identifier.thesoz10052354
internal.identifier.thesoz10034424
internal.identifier.thesoz10042910
internal.identifier.thesoz10042879
internal.identifier.thesoz10036843
internal.identifier.thesoz10034677
internal.identifier.thesoz10052329
internal.identifier.thesoz10037196
internal.identifier.thesoz10037376
internal.identifier.thesoz10036275
internal.identifier.thesoz10036750
internal.identifier.thesoz10034609
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentSonstigesde
dc.type.documentotheren
dc.source.pageinfo15de
internal.identifier.classoz10507
internal.identifier.document26
dc.contributor.corporateeditorBonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)
internal.identifier.corporateeditor986
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence19
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_15
internal.pdf.encryptedtrue
internal.pdf.restrictionsRead Only - fillInForm - modify - modifyAnnotation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record