Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJabkowski, Piotrde
dc.contributor.authorCichocki, Piotrde
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:47:36Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:47:36Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63846
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the demographic representativeness of different types of probabilistic samples based on the results of seven rounds of the European Social Survey. Focusing on the distinction between personal-register and non-personal-register samples, it demonstrates that the latter exhibit systematically larger gender- and age-biases. Expanding upon a 'gold standard' evaluation based on external criteria derived from Eurostat population statistics, an internal criteria analysis leads to the conclusion that the inferior quality of surveys involving interviewer-driven within-household selection of target respondents results from interviewer discretion. Such interference results in the selection of individuals with higher levels of readiness and availability, which superficially improves survey outcome rates while yielding samples of actually inferior quality. The internal-criteria approach provides a straightforward and undemanding way of monitoring representativeness of samples, and proves especially handy when it comes to large cross-country projects, as it requires no data external to the survey results, and allows for comparing surveys regardless of possible differences in sampling frames, sampling design and fieldwork execution procedures.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherprobabilistic samples; survey quality; personal-register samples; non-personal-register samples; interviewer interferencede
dc.titleWithin-household selection of target-respondents impairs demographic representativeness of probabilistic samples: evidence from seven rounds of the European Social Surveyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozEuropean Social Surveyde
dc.subject.thesozEuropean Social Surveyen
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozRepräsentativitätde
dc.subject.thesozrepresentativityen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10081998
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10056653
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo167-180de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i2.7383de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record