Show simple item record

Good Governance in Afrika - drei falsche Vorstellungen
[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorLierl, Maltede
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T13:21:47Z
dc.date.available2019-08-12T13:21:47Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn1862-3603de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63540
dc.description.abstractDespite the rise of multiparty democracy, many African governments still struggle to control corruption and to improve the legitimacy of the state. To promote better governance, international development assistance supports ambitious reform agendas and idealistic models of governance. However, these programmes and interventions frequently misunderstand the realities of governance in weak and fragile states. Corruption and patronage are usually not clandestine, but highly visible. It is not a lack of information or awareness that keeps citizens from holding their governments accountable, but a lack of effective and legitimate channels for public dissent. In many countries, elite networks continue to protect their members as they violate laws - and also expect them to bend formal rules to advance the interests of their group. Public participation can only contribute to government legitimacy if it has a genuine impact on political decisions. However this is often not the case, because elites have little to gain from building political consensus or aggregating competing interests into collectively rational decisions. Decentralisation reforms result in the proliferation of local-level institutions, but fail to bring the state closer to the people. Most African states have never had strong control over peripheral territories, and have relied on informal gatekeepers and traditional authorities to access local populations. Neither central governments nor local gatekeepers have strong incentives to cede real authority to local-level political institutions. Well-intentioned reform programmes fail to have the desired effects, because they attempt to change the political reality to conform to idealised conceptions of governance. Governance reforms might be more successful if they focus instead on reducing the contradictions between formal institutions and informal practices in weak and fragile states. To this end, development organisations should actively engage in research and innovation.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titlePromoting Good Governance in Africa - Three Popular Misconceptionsde
dc.title.alternativeGood Governance in Afrika - drei falsche Vorstellungende
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Afrika
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozAfrika südlich der Saharade
dc.subject.thesozAfrica South of the Saharaen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozGovernancede
dc.subject.thesozgovernanceen
dc.subject.thesozRegierungde
dc.subject.thesozgovernmenten
dc.subject.thesozTransparenzde
dc.subject.thesoztransparencyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Prozessde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical lawsuiten
dc.subject.thesozKorruptionde
dc.subject.thesozcorruptionen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Partizipationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical participationen
dc.subject.thesozZivilbevölkerungde
dc.subject.thesozcivilian populationen
dc.subject.thesozKlientelismusde
dc.subject.thesozclientelismen
dc.subject.thesozDezentralisationde
dc.subject.thesozdecentralizationen
dc.subject.thesozBürgerde
dc.subject.thesozcitizenen
dc.subject.thesozStaatde
dc.subject.thesoznational stateen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Machtde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical poweren
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63540-3
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034678
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10054891
internal.identifier.thesoz10040090
internal.identifier.thesoz10066371
internal.identifier.thesoz10052688
internal.identifier.thesoz10038818
internal.identifier.thesoz10054194
internal.identifier.thesoz10039066
internal.identifier.thesoz10049035
internal.identifier.thesoz10040948
internal.identifier.thesoz10039200
internal.identifier.thesoz10039642
internal.identifier.thesoz10049213
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo12de
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Afrika-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor145
internal.identifier.ddc321
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series283
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record