Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPapachristou, Ioanna-Annade
dc.contributor.authorRosas-Casals, Martide
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-05T08:53:01Z
dc.date.available2019-07-05T08:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63080
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we present a simple methodology based on Max-Neef, Elizalde and Hopenhayn (1991) “human scale development” paradigm to measure current levels of Quality of Life (QoL) for urban environments. In this procedure, fundamental human needs form the study domains. We assess their fulfilment with a set of questions reflecting the subjective dimension of QoL. We sort questions into needs after two consecutive processes: a qualitative one involving local communities and/or expert groups, and a quantitative one involving the definition of weights for each question and per need. Complementarily, we add objective indicators to reflect the objective dimension of QoL. This way, we make possible a comparison between the two dimensions and a definition and computation of an integrative QoL. We argue that this method can be used to define more holistic urban quality indexes to improve decision making processes, policies and plans. It can also be seen as a tool to enhance bottom-up approaches and processes of urban analysis to create more liveable places for the dwellers.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherhuman scale development; integration; need satisfaction; quality of life; urban environmentsde
dc.titleMaximising the Degree of User Choice: a Simple Tool to Measure Current Levels of Quality of Life in Urban Environmentsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2006de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozSiedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozLebensqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozquality of lifeen
dc.subject.thesozStadtgebietde
dc.subject.thesozmunicipal areaen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10050696
internal.identifier.thesoz10059068
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo207-222de
internal.identifier.classoz10213
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicPublic Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into Implementationde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2006de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2006
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record