Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Aernout H.J.de
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Kungbeide
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T14:17:17Z
dc.date.available2019-02-04T14:17:17Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2285-4916de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61212
dc.description.abstractFoundational assumptions under legal systems come adrift with innovation in non-law disciplines. In an effort towards improved understanding of what is going on (and what can be done) we turn to agent-based modeling as a tool. We use the KEI project for our use case, apply Holland’s ECHO framework as legal requirements engineering tool and use NetLogo as platform for implementation (resulting in an application we call Epiframer). We study parameter-change induced behavioral dynamics in the resulting artificial society. Findings are in two tiers: (i) on the role of the law in a multi-force field and (ii) on the role of institutions (also: sibling disciplines) for informing specialist legal professionals. We submit epiframer’s assumptions for diverse-disciplinary scrutiny as a closure. We have not yet reached a level that warrants the deployment of statistical learning methods onto data provided by simulation runs and are aware that such an approach has - where legal requirements engineering events tend to be sparsely punctuated - limited added value for legal requirements engineering situations anyway. With De Marchi (2005) our claim is that under such conditions computational, mathematical and, indeed, qualitative methods have complementary uses.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherAgent-based modeling; ECHO; innovating legal practice; KEI; legal requirements engineering; disciplinary consultationde
dc.titleAgent-Based Modelling: A New Tool for Legal Requirements Engineering: Introduction and Use Case (KEI)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryROU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozJustizde
dc.subject.classozJudiciaryen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsanwendungde
dc.subject.thesozlegal usageen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsstreitde
dc.subject.thesozlawsuiten
dc.subject.thesozJustizde
dc.subject.thesozjudiciaryen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationstechnologiede
dc.subject.thesozcommunication technologyen
dc.subject.thesozDigitalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdigitalizationen
dc.subject.thesozEffizienzde
dc.subject.thesozefficiencyen
dc.subject.thesozModellde
dc.subject.thesozmodelen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61212-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionLeiden Universityde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035818
internal.identifier.thesoz10056179
internal.identifier.thesoz10048423
internal.identifier.thesoz10039942
internal.identifier.thesoz10063943
internal.identifier.thesoz10041426
internal.identifier.thesoz10036422
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-21de
internal.identifier.classoz40102
internal.identifier.journal490
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.source.issuetopicLegal Requirements Engineeringde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort40100de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record