Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRuckdeschel, Kerstinde
dc.contributor.authorSalles, Annede
dc.contributor.authorDiabaté, Sabinede
dc.contributor.authorToulemon, Laurentde
dc.contributor.authorRégnier-Loilier, Arnaudde
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T15:56:07Z
dc.date.available2019-01-17T15:56:07Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61064
dc.description.abstractThe neighbouring countries France and Germany show very different levels of fertility. Differences also exist between the two regions of East and West Germany. The aim of this paper is to help close a remaining gap in explaining these differences by applying a cultural concept of role models. Data is based on the German survey "Family-related role models" (2012) and the French survey "Situation de couple, intentions de fécondité et opinions sur la famille", ELIPSS (2013) offering a new approach to measuring the impact of social norms. The analysis uses multinomial logistic regression. We identified role models regarding the acceptance of childlessness on the one hand and large families on the other, as well as regarding the link between marriage and parenthood and the importance of financial security, suggesting different fertility-related cultures in France and Germany. There is a strong predominance of one general role model in France - that of having at least two children. In Germany, in contrast, there is a dominant role model - the two child family - but there are also several less central role models. The dominant model in France even leads to a sort of self-stigmatisation of individuals who want to stay childless, whereas childlessness is generally accepted in Germany. Role model differences between East and West Germany show a lower acceptance of large families and a higher acceptance of single-child families in the East. Our results highlight the importance of role models for fertility intentions as well as the relevance of cultural dimensions when studying the impact of the institutional framework on fertility.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.titleUnequal Neighbours? A French-German Comparison of Family Size Intentionsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume43de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozFamiliensoziologie, Sexualsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozFamily Sociology, Sociology of Sexual Behavioren
dc.subject.thesozFamiliengründungde
dc.subject.thesozfamily formationen
dc.subject.thesozFamilienplanungde
dc.subject.thesozfamily planningen
dc.subject.thesozFamiliengrößede
dc.subject.thesozfamily sizeen
dc.subject.thesozFruchtbarkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertilityen
dc.subject.thesozKinderzahlde
dc.subject.thesoznumber of childrenen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozVorbildde
dc.subject.thesozrole modelen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Normde
dc.subject.thesozsocial normen
dc.subject.thesozWertorientierungde
dc.subject.thesozvalue-orientationen
dc.subject.thesozFamilienpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozfamily policyen
dc.subject.thesozKinderlosigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozchildlessnessen
dc.subject.thesozFrankreichde
dc.subject.thesozFranceen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozalte Bundesländerde
dc.subject.thesozold federal statesen
dc.subject.thesozneue Bundesländerde
dc.subject.thesozNew Federal Statesen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10064247
internal.identifier.thesoz10043302
internal.identifier.thesoz10043280
internal.identifier.thesoz10044407
internal.identifier.thesoz10048826
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10051012
internal.identifier.thesoz10045314
internal.identifier.thesoz10053899
internal.identifier.thesoz10043309
internal.identifier.thesoz10045007
internal.identifier.thesoz10040791
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10040106
internal.identifier.thesoz10040107
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo187-210de
internal.identifier.classoz10209
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2018-12ende
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record