Show simple item record

Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJúnior, José Benedito de Almeidade
dc.contributor.authorTomaz, Loyana Christian de Limade
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Luciana Xavier dede
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-02T13:50:57Z
dc.date.available2019-01-02T13:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2178-1036de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/60894
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works.de
dc.languageptde
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.titleRousseau e o paradoxo da censurade
dc.title.alternativeRousseau and the paradox of censorshipde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalGriot: Revista de Filosofia
dc.source.volume18de
dc.publisher.countryBRA
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.thesozRousseau, J.de
dc.subject.thesozRousseau, J.en
dc.subject.thesozZensurde
dc.subject.thesozcensorshipen
dc.subject.thesozPhilosophiede
dc.subject.thesozphilosophyen
dc.subject.thesozPolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpoliticsen
dc.subject.thesozReligionde
dc.subject.thesozreligionen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10056893
internal.identifier.thesoz10055166
internal.identifier.thesoz10045191
internal.identifier.thesoz10034827
internal.identifier.thesoz10039845
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo176-186de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.journal1416
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort30100de
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record