SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v17i1.791

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

O "antipsicologismo" em Husserl e Heidegger: da consciência ao dasein

The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
[journal article]

Carmo, Ísis Nery do

Abstract

Our aim is to propose a dialogue between Husserl and Heidegger relating them from the criticism that these philosophers present to the investigation of naturalistic aspect about man, predominant in the philosophical tradition. For Husserl, the domain of naturalism represents the influence of Experim... view more

Our aim is to propose a dialogue between Husserl and Heidegger relating them from the criticism that these philosophers present to the investigation of naturalistic aspect about man, predominant in the philosophical tradition. For Husserl, the domain of naturalism represents the influence of Experimental Psychology on philosophy, Heidegger, in turn, highlights the anthropological thematic found in the history of philosophy. According to the first, "psychologism" entails the reduction of man to his empirical components, and to the second, "anthropologism" is equivalent to a process of man’s reification. "Psychologism" and "anthropologism" are inadequate reflections because they equate man with the natural object, that is, reflections that do not consider man's true sense of being, ignoring intentional consciousness and existence. Thus Husserl and Heidegger share the attempt to make philosophy return to that true essence of man, that is, both philosophers advocate the denaturalization of reflection and develop phenomenology as the exercise of this return.... view less

Classification
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion

Free Keywords
Phenomenology; Psychologism; Anthropologism; Consciousness; Existence

Document language
Portuguese

Publication Year
2018

Page/Pages
p. 326-336

Journal
Griot: Revista de Filosofia, 17 (2018) 1

ISSN
2178-1036

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.