Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorSerfraz, Ayeshade
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T06:23:06Z
dc.date.available2018-11-05T06:23:06Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4947de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59926
dc.description.abstractFDI inflows play an important role in bringing growth and development to emerging economies. Pakistan is also heavily dependent on FDI inflows for achieving a high growth rate but the main obstacle being faced by Pakistan is increasing number of terrorist activities. Although there is a vast literature available which throws light on FDI lead economic growth relation based on terrorism but this study will surely add new dimensions to the ever increasing research on overseas investment in developing countries, specifically Muslim countries, by correlating religious sectarianism with FDI and economic growth. The present study analyses the effect of religious sectarianism on the relationship between FDI inflows and economic growth in Pakistan for the period of 1989-2016. For easuring sectarian terrorism, data of sectarian violence in Pakistan is taken for carrying out the empirical analysis. This study explores an empirical relationship by testing a two-way causality between FDI inflows and economic growth of Pakistan, using the techniques of Johansen Cointegration and VECM model. For testing two way causality, two separate models are constructed; in the first model FDI inflows is taken as a dependent variable with economic growth and sectarian terrorism as independent variables. In second model, economic growth is taken as a dependent variable and FDI inflows along-with sectarian terrorism are taken as independent variables. ADF and KPSS tests have been applied to check the stationarity status of variables included in dataset. Later Johansen Cointegration test has been applied twice for checking the strength of Cointegration. The results of VECM and system equation model show that the first model is more practical as the F-statistic is strong in case of first model as compared to second model 2 but the purpose is achieved and a two-way causality has been confirmed by empirical analysis. Wald test and Granger Causality tests have been applied to check the exogeniety and causality respectively. The results show that FDI is not weakly exogenous whereas the second model concludes that GDP is weakly exogenous. The same results are confirmed by Granger Causality test.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherJohansen Cointegration; Sectarianismde
dc.title'What is the effect of foreign direct investment inflows oneconomic growth in Pakistan?' An empirical analysis in the light of religious sectarianism as a catalyst for terrorismde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume59de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesZÖSS Discussion Paper
dc.subject.classozVolkswirtschaftstheoriede
dc.subject.classozNational Economyen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozeconomic growthen
dc.subject.thesozIslamic societyen
dc.subject.thesozSchwellenlandde
dc.subject.thesozPakistanen
dc.subject.thesozforeign investmenten
dc.subject.thesozreligiöse Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozSektede
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftswachstumde
dc.subject.thesozdirect investmenten
dc.subject.thesozreligious factorsen
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungslandde
dc.subject.thesozDirektinvestitionde
dc.subject.thesoznewly industrializing countriesen
dc.subject.thesozterrorismen
dc.subject.thesozislamische Gesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozPakistande
dc.subject.thesozTerrorismusde
dc.subject.thesozdeveloping countryen
dc.subject.thesozsecten
dc.subject.thesozAuslandsinvestitionde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59926-4
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045280
internal.identifier.thesoz10060156
internal.identifier.thesoz10050221
internal.identifier.thesoz10057575
internal.identifier.thesoz10034610
internal.identifier.thesoz10037284
internal.identifier.thesoz10042340
internal.identifier.thesoz10057638
internal.identifier.thesoz10055821
internal.identifier.thesoz10037282
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo61de
internal.identifier.classoz1090301
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorUniversität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS)
internal.identifier.corporateeditor337
internal.identifier.ddc330
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series627
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_2
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record