Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorOtt, Cordulade
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-04T09:04:58Z
dc.date.available2018-10-04T09:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn2297-6477de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59285
dc.description.abstractWorld leaders at the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York have reconfirmed the relevance of sustainability as the guiding paradigm in countering the development and climate crisis of the Anthropocene. Recent decades however, have been characterized by confusion, contestations, and arbitrariness in defining the nature and pathways of sustainable development. Humanity must urgently find ways to unlock the potential of the sustainability paradigm and organize a sustainability transformation. An emerging sustainability science community has already established considerable consensus on essential features of transformative science and research. Sustainability scholars are providing growing evidence that an emancipatory and democratic construction of sustainable development and more equitable, deliberative, and democratized knowledge generation are pivotal in tackling sustainability challenges. These findings are further underpinned by experiences gained in the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999–2015) - a rare case of a long-term, transnational, and transdisciplinary research endeavour already completed. The programme fulfilled the dual role which is compulsory in transformative research: It generated contextualized knowledge and innovation at the science-society interface while simultaneously securing meaningful participation and Southern agency in a co-evolutionary process. This paper offers insight into the programme’s adaptive structure and implementation processes, which fostered deliberation, capacity development, and joint programme navigation benchmarked against local needs and broader sustainability demands. The ESAPP experience confirms that, if taken as the overarching frame of reference for all actors involved, the sustainability paradigm unfolds its integrative and transformative power. It enables sustainability-oriented actors from all scientific and practical fields to seek consilience between differing development and innovation paradigms and synchronize their development agendas and research frameworks on behalf of societal co-production of knowledge and innovation. Accordingly, the sustainability paradigm has the power to guide development and innovation policy, and practice out of the current confusion and ineffectiveness.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.othercapacity development; equity; partnerships; research; sustainability science; transformationde
dc.titleEnabling Transformative Research: Lessons from the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999-2015)de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-5.1.15de
dc.source.journalChallenges in Sustainability
dc.source.volume5de
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesoznachhaltige Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozsustainable developmenten
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozdevelopment policyen
dc.subject.thesozKlimapolitikde
dc.subject.thesozclimate policyen
dc.subject.thesozNachhaltigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozsustainabilityen
dc.subject.thesozInnovationde
dc.subject.thesozinnovationen
dc.subject.thesozWissende
dc.subject.thesozknowledgeen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozinternational cooperationen
dc.subject.thesozNord-Süd-Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesoznorth-south relationsen
dc.subject.thesozDeliberationde
dc.subject.thesozdeliberationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10062390
internal.identifier.thesoz10042388
internal.identifier.thesoz10076323
internal.identifier.thesoz10064837
internal.identifier.thesoz10047538
internal.identifier.thesoz10035168
internal.identifier.thesoz10037395
internal.identifier.thesoz10047809
internal.identifier.thesoz10054815
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo15-23de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal795
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicEarth System Governance - Task Force Initiative on Sustainability Sciencede
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12924/cis2017.05010015de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttp://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/oai/@@oai:ojs.www.librelloph.com:article/267
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record