dc.contributor.author | Archer, Margaret S. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-08-10T15:32:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T22:06:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T22:06:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/5884 | |
dc.description.abstract | The problem of linking 'explanation' & 'understanding' remains unresolved -- as Weber left it. This paper challenges the view that their reconciliation is impossible, as some theorists have maintained. Their case is that the entities involved -- subjective meanings & objective relationships -- are too ontologically different to be combined. From the stratified ontology of Social Realism, which acknowledges that different properties & powers pertain to different components & levels of social reality, this is no barrier in principle to their combination. However, in practice Realists have not given an adequate account of how 'subjectivity' & 'objectivity' are linked, which also weakens Realism's solution to the 'problem of structure & agency.' This paper offers a refinement: the human power of reflexivity is viewed as mediating between our subjective concerns & our objective social contexts. Reflexive deliberations account for what agents actually do -- and they do not all do the same thing -- under very similar social circumstances. The introduction of reflexivity enables the (socially) objective & the (personally) subjective to be combined into a single account of socially structured & structuring action. | en |
dc.language | cs | |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | Social Theories | |
dc.subject.other | Reality | |
dc.subject.other | Agency and Structure | |
dc.subject.other | Reflexivity | |
dc.subject.other | Ontology | |
dc.title | Lze najít pojítko mezi vysvětlením a porozuměním? | de |
dc.title.alternative | Can Explanation and Understanding Be Linked? | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review | de |
dc.source.volume | 44 | de |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Generelle Theorien der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | General Concepts, Major Hypotheses and Major Theories in the Social Sciences | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-58840 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2009-08-13T09:54:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | t | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 7-22 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10103 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_CHANGED | |