Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Stephen M.de
dc.contributor.authorJones, Christopher M.de
dc.contributor.authorKammen, Daniel M.de
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T07:36:12Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T07:36:12Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/58385
dc.description.abstractConsumption-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventories have emerged to describe full life cycle contributions of households to climate change at country, state and increasingly city scales. Using this approach, how much carbon footprint abatement potential is within the control of local governments, and which policies hold the most potential to reduce emissions? This study quantifies the potential of local policies and programs to meet aggressive GHG reduction targets using a consumption-based, high geospatial resolution planning model for the state of California. We find that roughly 35% of all carbon footprint abatement potential statewide is from activities at least partially within the control of local governments. The study shows large variation in the size and composition of carbon footprints and abatement opportunities by ~23,000 Census block groups (i.e., neighborhood-scale within cities), 717 cities and 58 counties across the state. These data and companion online tools can help cities better understand priorities to reduce GHGs from a comprehensive, consumption-based perspective, with potential application to the full United States and internationally.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.othercarbon footprint; climate action plans; climate change; consumption; emissions inventory; greenhouse gasde
dc.titleCarbon Footprint Planning: Quantifying Local and State Mitigation Opportunities for 700 California Citiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1218de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo35-51de
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc577
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicUrban Planning to Enable a 1.5 °C Scenariode
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i2.1218de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1218
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record