Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGinting, Henndyde
dc.contributor.authorBangun, Yuni Rosde
dc.contributor.authorFebriansyah, Haryde
dc.contributor.authorSetiawan, Bagusde
dc.contributor.authorLee, Bonitade
dc.contributor.authorFrissilia, Giande
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T13:37:02Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T13:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2469-6501de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57862
dc.description.abstractCompanies have been concerned on measurement and improvement of their employees’ engagement using various conceptual models. Since every company has their own specific vision, mission, and values, customization is needed to measure employee engagement objectively. One of the biggest state-owned company in Indonesia develops a specific model of employee engagement, consisted of 12-dimensions. Those dimensions have been operationalized in order to build a set of questionnaire to measure employee engagement. This study elaborates the procedure taken to create, validate, and testing the reliability of the measure. We administered the newly designed questionnaire (38 items measuring 12-dimensions) as well as Gallup Employee Engagement and Aon Hewitt questionnaires to 869 employees of the company. Significant correlations between measures, significant item-total item correlations, factorial robustness, and discriminative power confirmed the validity of the measure. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach Alpha confirmed the reliability of the measure. These multiple sources of evidence are discussed.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.othercustomized measurement; procedure; validity; reliabilityde
dc.titleDeveloping Customized Employee Engagement Measure in an Indonesian Large Company: Procedure, Validity, and Reliabilityde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Business and Applied Social Science
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozManagementde
dc.subject.classozManagement Scienceen
dc.subject.thesozIndonesiende
dc.subject.thesozIndonesiaen
dc.subject.thesozUnternehmenskulturde
dc.subject.thesozorganizational cultureen
dc.subject.thesozPersonalpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpersonnel policyen
dc.subject.thesozMitarbeiterde
dc.subject.thesozco-workeren
dc.subject.thesozEngagementde
dc.subject.thesozinvolvementen
dc.subject.thesozintrinsische Motivationde
dc.subject.thesozintrinsic motivationen
dc.subject.thesozBerufszufriedenheitde
dc.subject.thesozjob satisfactionen
dc.subject.thesozSüdostasiende
dc.subject.thesozSoutheast Asiaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57862-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042317
internal.identifier.thesoz10060810
internal.identifier.thesoz10054341
internal.identifier.thesoz10038100
internal.identifier.thesoz10034997
internal.identifier.thesoz10079370
internal.identifier.thesoz10038695
internal.identifier.thesoz10036844
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-18de
internal.identifier.classoz1090401
internal.identifier.journal1108
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10216de
internal.embargo.terms2018-06-30
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record