Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGhasemi, Parvinde
dc.contributor.authorKahmini, Mostafa Sadeghide
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T08:53:23Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T08:53:23Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.47.174.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57496
dc.description.abstractFeminists, among others, have found Eve's representation in Milton's Paradise Lost problematic over the last centuries. Some of them consider Eve to be Adam’s inferior while others find traces of egalitarian relationship between them. This study uses Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson's Politeness Theory and applies it to the conversations between Adam and Eve prior to the Fall in order to address this issue. It is demonstrated in this article that, before the Fall, Eve always exercises less power than Adam except for a brief moment that she achieves equality.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherMilton, J.; Paradiesde
dc.titleEve's unEven relationship with Adam: Milton's Paradise Lost in the light of politeness theoryde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue47de
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.classozKultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologiede
dc.subject.classozCultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literatureen
dc.subject.thesozHöflichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpolitenessen
dc.subject.thesozTheoriede
dc.subject.thesoztheoryen
dc.subject.thesozGleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozequalityen
dc.subject.thesozMachtde
dc.subject.thesozpoweren
dc.subject.thesozBibelde
dc.subject.thesozbibleen
dc.subject.thesozGeschlechtde
dc.subject.thesozgenderen
dc.subject.thesozVergleichde
dc.subject.thesozcomparisonen
dc.subject.thesozFeminismusde
dc.subject.thesozfeminismen
dc.subject.thesozLiteraturde
dc.subject.thesozliteratureen
dc.subject.thesozDichtungde
dc.subject.thesozpoetryen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57496-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10047676
internal.identifier.thesoz10035127
internal.identifier.thesoz10045811
internal.identifier.thesoz10046561
internal.identifier.thesoz10039248
internal.identifier.thesoz10045224
internal.identifier.thesoz10047774
internal.identifier.thesoz10043409
internal.identifier.thesoz10035991
internal.identifier.thesoz10041013
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo174-183de
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.classoz10216
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.47.174de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-55@@16
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record