Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCallens, Marloesde
dc.contributor.authorLoosveldt, Geertde
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T14:00:49Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T14:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57068
dc.description.abstractIn 2010 the European Social Survey included a module on public trust in national police and criminal courts. The included questions were especially susceptible to item nonresponse. This study examines the interviewer and country variability in responding “I don’t know” to these questions using a beta-binomial logistic mixed model, controlling for demographic background variables. The results show that there are large differences between interviewers and countries which are not due to underlying demographic differences between the respondents. The difference in data quality between interviewers and countries make (inter)national comparisons more difficult. More importantly, we could assume that these missing values could be avoided with sound data collection methods and interviewer trainings.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherinterviewer variance; item nonresponse; trust in justice; trust in police; European Social Survey; ESSde
dc.title'Don’t Know' Responses to Survey Items on Trust in Police and Criminal Courts: A Word of Cautionde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozdemographic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozvariabilityen
dc.subject.thesozcourten
dc.subject.thesozinterviewen
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozEuropade
dc.subject.thesozPolizeide
dc.subject.thesozVariabilitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsordnungde
dc.subject.thesozconfidenceen
dc.subject.thesozpoliceen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozEuropeen
dc.subject.thesozlegal orderen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozinternational comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozpopulationen
dc.subject.thesozGerichtde
dc.subject.thesozInterviewde
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozVertrauende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozdemographische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040018
internal.identifier.thesoz10042879
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10034764
internal.identifier.thesoz10035448
internal.identifier.thesoz10037913
internal.identifier.thesoz10045350
internal.identifier.thesoz10047775
internal.identifier.thesoz10040663
internal.identifier.thesoz10060997
internal.identifier.thesoz10061508
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00002de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record