Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKhaghaninejad, Mohammad Saberde
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T06:55:33Z
dc.date.available2018-05-02T06:55:33Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.56.90.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57032
dc.description.abstractQur'an as the sacred book of Muslims has been subjected to different types of interpretations from the beginning of its revelations, approximately from 1400 years ago. All the Islamic theology scholars, even unmuslims, tried to make a contribution as the best of their abilities to its understanding. By the advent of new post-structuralist approaches of textual analysis techniques in West, the possibility of interpreting this holy book has obsessed the modern textual analysts all over the world. This article tried to investigate the possibility of Barthes’ “Death of the Author” as one of the most controversial theories of modern text analysis. Considering the fact that, the author of Qur'an has not been a human to compose the text based on the dominant social, cultural and economical context of that time, the application of Barthes’ “Death of the Author” to the Qur'anic interpretation seems to be logically impossible. Furthermore, as the Qur'anic verses are classified into two categories of “Mohkamaat” and “Motashabehaat” based on Quran itself, this theory of text analysis can be utmost be applied to the latter in order to offer a better comprehension of the “Mohkamaat” as there are various interpretations of these “ayahs” in Islamic literature.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleApplication of Barthes' "Death of the Author" to qur'an: possible or impossible?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue56de
dc.subject.classozKultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologiede
dc.subject.classozReligionssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozCultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literatureen
dc.subject.classozSociology of Religionen
dc.subject.thesozTextanalysede
dc.subject.thesozLiteraturde
dc.subject.thesozcontext analysisen
dc.subject.thesozIslamde
dc.subject.thesozKorande
dc.subject.thesozliteratureen
dc.subject.thesozIslamen
dc.subject.thesozKontextanalysede
dc.subject.thesozPoststrukturalismusde
dc.subject.thesozpost-structuralismen
dc.subject.thesozKoranen
dc.subject.thesoztext analysisen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10048094
internal.identifier.thesoz10035477
internal.identifier.thesoz10035991
internal.identifier.thesoz10035474
internal.identifier.thesoz10058605
internal.identifier.thesoz10072244
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo90-102de
internal.identifier.classoz10216
internal.identifier.classoz10218
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.56.90de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-41@@11
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record