Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMohsenzadeh, Rasoulde
dc.contributor.authorMomeni, Javadde
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T06:42:36Z
dc.date.available2018-04-09T06:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.61.82.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56713
dc.description.abstractIn his Discipline and Punish (1995), Foucault describes the plague-stricken city where authorities exercised surveillance to control the contagion of the disease. As Foucault states, the first precaution to take was the strict division of space which led to the isolation of dwellers; this spatial partitioning reinforced the notion of pervasive surveillance and paved the way for the modern disciplinary society of which Panopticon was an ideal architectural embodiment. In this paper, we try to show how a combination of the plague-ridden city’s discipline diagrams and Panopticism make the whole scene of Auster's Ghosts. By focusing on the role of writing in power mechanisms depicted in the novel, we illustrate the power-knowledge relations which involve the characters in the process of subjectification and which construct the subject position of the author (Blue) who acts as the (in) visible eye of authority. Then, we argue that Blue's dilemma aggravates mainly because he identifies his individual life with his Foucauldian "author function".en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleThe (in)visible eye of authority: notes on surveillance in Paul Auster's Ghostsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue61de
dc.subject.classozKultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologiede
dc.subject.classozCultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literatureen
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.thesozLiteraturde
dc.subject.thesozSubjektivierungde
dc.subject.thesozwriteren
dc.subject.thesozsubjectivationen
dc.subject.thesozMachtde
dc.subject.thesozliteratureen
dc.subject.thesozauthoren
dc.subject.thesozSchriftstellerde
dc.subject.thesozAutorde
dc.subject.thesozpoweren
dc.subject.thesozPhilosophiede
dc.subject.thesozphilosophyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035991
internal.identifier.thesoz10084385
internal.identifier.thesoz10037542
internal.identifier.thesoz10041010
internal.identifier.thesoz10046561
internal.identifier.thesoz10045191
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo82-86de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.classoz10216
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.61.82de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-33@@11
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record