dc.contributor.author | Lemos, Leany Barreiro | |
dc.contributor.author | Llanos, Mariana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-23T14:03:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-23T14:03:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0102-6909 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54848 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper assesses empirically the way in which two Latin American upper chambers - the Argentine and Brazilian senates - made use of their confirmation prerogatives between 1989 and 2003: whether taking on a deferential posture towards executive proposals or a more active role, including both consultation and oversight. The article first analyses all nominations regarding outcome (confirmed, rejected, and withdrawn) and length of process. Then, the similarities and differences are used to advance some explanatory hypotheses. Special attention is paid to the impact of political factors, especially senates internal rules for the organization of the legislative work. | en |
dc.language | pt | |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.subject.other | Parlamentarisches System; Ländervergleich; Abgeordnetenhaus; Zweite Kammer; Amt des Präsidenten; Legitimation von Herrschaft | |
dc.title | O senado e as aprovações de autoridades: um estudo comparativo entre Argentina e Brasil | |
dc.title.alternative | The politics of senatorial confirmation: a comparative study of Argentina and Brazil | |
dc.title.alternative | Le sénat et l'approbation de hauts fonctionnaires: une étude comparative entre l'Argentine et du Brésil | |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais | |
dc.source.volume | 22 | |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | |
dc.source.issue | 64 | |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politisches System | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political system | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Verfassung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | constitution | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Argentinien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Argentina | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Brasilien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Brazil | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | internationaler Vergleich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | international comparison | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Legislative | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | legislative | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54848-7 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GIGA | |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040669 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046005 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036737 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10039751 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047775 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045413 | |
dc.type.stock | article | |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 115-138 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1246 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092007000200009 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 32 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | |
ssoar.wgl.collection | true | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.6 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |