Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorFrejka, Tomas
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-17T10:25:42Z
dc.date.available2017-10-17T10:25:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54258
dc.description.abstract"This paper deals with the fertility transition, one of the two essential components of the demographic transition. The analysis demonstrates that by applying the cohort perspective new insights are obtained about how the fertility transition unfolded. Within the overall framework of the fertility transition there were four distinct pathways of fertility trends. Combining these findings with those of other scholars shows that the demographic transition has not yet led to an equilibrium of relatively stable low mortality and stable low fertility. The four fertility transition pathways are the following: (1) The Western fertility transition pathway characterized by major cohort total fertility rate (CTFR) fluctuations; (2) the South European fertility transition pathway characterized by an almost uninterrupted CTFR decline; (3) the Central and East European fertility transition pathway characterized by stable CTFRs in the 1920s to 1950s cohorts and a decline in the 1960s and 1970s cohorts; (4) the East and South-East Asia fertility transition pathway characterized by a late start in the mid-20th century with rapidly declining CTFRs. The exploration of societal conditions shaping fertility trends in the 19th and 20th centuries confirms Notestein’s conclusions that the causes are a complex combination of 'technological, social, economic, and political developments' as well as cultural and ideational effects, and that it is 'impossible to be precise about the various causal factors'. At times the primary factors were economic, as in the Great Depression of the 1930s and the 1960s post-war prosperity in Western countries. However, these economic factors also had many political, cultural, social, policy and other important facets. In Central and Eastern Europe the primary factors during the era of state socialism were the political system and social policies. The patriarchal nature of societies was the prime factor shaping fertility trends in Southern Europe and in East and South-East Asia." (author's abstract). This article contains supplementary material in the form of an online appendix: http://dx.doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-10enen
dc.languageen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherfertility transition pathways; cohort fertility; fertility transition causes
dc.titleThe Fertility Transition Revisited: A Cohort Perspective
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume42
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungsentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozpopulation developmenten
dc.subject.thesozFruchtbarkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertilityen
dc.subject.thesozGeburtde
dc.subject.thesozbirthen
dc.subject.thesozQuantitätde
dc.subject.thesozquantityen
dc.subject.thesozGeburtenhäufigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertility rateen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozpolitical factorsen
dc.subject.thesozwirtschaftliche Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozkulturelle Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcultural factorsen
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozinternational comparisonen
dc.subject.thesoz19. Jahrhundertde
dc.subject.thesoznineteenth centuryen
dc.subject.thesoz20. Jahrhundertde
dc.subject.thesoztwentieth centuryen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen
internal.identifier.thesoz10039081
internal.identifier.thesoz10044407
internal.identifier.thesoz10044666
internal.identifier.thesoz10044683
internal.identifier.thesoz10044676
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
internal.identifier.thesoz10053636
internal.identifier.thesoz10039014
internal.identifier.thesoz10045240
internal.identifier.thesoz10047775
internal.identifier.thesoz10063147
internal.identifier.thesoz10063150
dc.type.stockarticle
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo89-116
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-09en
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.5
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record