Diese Seite wird derzeit technisch überarbeitet. Es kann dabei vorübergehend zu längeren Ladezeiten kommen. Wir bitten, eventuelle Unannehmlichkeiten zu entschuldigen und danken für Ihr Verständnis.
The Legitimation of Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in Corporatist Concepts of Legal Scholars in the Weimar Republic
[journal article]
dc.contributor.author | Collin, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-11T10:49:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-11T10:49:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2463 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54038 | |
dc.description.abstract | Corporatist regulation has a hybrid structure in that it covers state regulation, regulated self-regulation as well as private-public co-regulation. Notably diverging from the standard mode of state regulation, such arrangements required a higher degree of legitimation. Corporatist concepts flourished in the Weimar Republic. This paper deals with three legal scholars’ considerations regarding how to legitimize corporatist models, namely Edgar Tatarin-Tarnheyden, Heinrich Herrfahrdt, and Friedrich Glum. Their institutional touchstone was the Imperial Economic Council, as provided for by article 165 of the Weimar Constitution. This article envisioned a multi-level system of economic councils ranging from regional economic councils up to the Imperial Economic Council and involving representatives of all occupational groups in the performance of state tasks. However, only a Provisional Imperial Economic Council, with a restricted consultative remit, was ever actually established. Based on this model, Tatarin-Tarnheyden, Heinrich Herrfahrdt, and Friedrich Glum conceptualized organizational structures aiming at the comprehensive inclusion of non-state actors. They were legitimized primarily with reference to their output; that is, these organizational forms were supposed to enable a more appropriate and efficient realization of public interests. The input-based argument was basically a question of participation, which implies considerable proximity to typical topoi of democratic legitimation. This similarity is perhaps counter-intuitive, given that corporatist concepts are traditionally associated with anti-democratic ideologies due to their anti-parliamentarian slant. The numerous points of convergence between corporatist and democratic thought simultaneously reflect the heterogeneity of democratic reasoning in the Weimar period and the openness for ideas that were sceptical of - or even hostile to - parliamentary democracy and the party-based state. | en |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject.ddc | Geschichte | de |
dc.subject.ddc | History | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.title | The Legitimation of Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in Corporatist Concepts of Legal Scholars in the Weimar Republic | |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Politics and Governance | |
dc.source.volume | 5 | |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | |
dc.subject.classoz | allgemeine Geschichte | de |
dc.subject.classoz | General History | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Korporatismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | corporatism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | öffentliches Recht | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | public law | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Selbststeuerung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | self-regulation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Regulierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | regulation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Demokratieverständnis | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | conception of democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Macht | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | power | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Struktur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | structure | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaftsrat | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic council | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Weimarer Republik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Weimar Republic (Germany, 1918-33) | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049786 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10053586 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057747 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10039952 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040683 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046561 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034872 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10062437 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040906 | |
dc.type.stock | article | |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 15-25 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 30301 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 787 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 900 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Legitimization of Private and Public Regulation: Past and Present | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.784 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.5 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen
Political System, Constitution, Government -
allgemeine Geschichte
General History