Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGellner, Ernestde
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-27T15:22:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:45:35Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:45:35Z
dc.date.issued1995de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/5373
dc.description.abstractContrasts the philosophies of Tomas G. Masaryk & Vaclav Havel, the men who led the Czech Velvet Revolution in 1918 & 1989. Masaryk opposed a regime he would not fully reject until later in life, whereas Havel opposed an indisputably repulsive regime. For this reason, Masaryk sought deeper reasons for the revolution & legitimated the renewal of the Czech state with his philosophy of history. Positing that the world evolved from theocracy to democracy, Masaryk argued that the Czechs initially provided the impetus for the shift dcuring the fifteenth-century Hussite movement, lost touch with the democratization process after the Battle on the White Mountain in 1620, & returned to the mainstream of European history in their fight against absolutism. Masaryk's faith in the meaning & strength of democracy was subsequently destroyed by the Munich Agreement. Havel, by contrast, based his politcal vision not on the philosophy of history, but on belief in democratic values. Both men have accepted a rather high level of continuity with the overturned political structures, which may be the price of a 'velvet' approach to political revolution.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherIntellectual History
dc.subject.otherPolitical Philosophy
dc.subject.otherPresidents
dc.subject.otherDemocracy
dc.subject.otherCzech Republic
dc.subject.otherpolitical philosophy, Czech Tomas G. Masaryk vs Vaclav Havel, 1918-1989;
dc.titleThe Price of Velvet: Thomas Masaryk and Vaclav Havelde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalSociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Reviewde
dc.source.volume3de
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozGeschichtede
dc.subject.classozHistoryen
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53735de
dc.date.modified2009-03-10T16:04:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrighttde
dc.source.pageinfo45-57
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz30300
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc900
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record