SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(348.1 KB)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53705-3

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Content validation of the operational definitions of non-acceptance to hypertension treatment

Validação de conteúdo das definições operacionais da não adesão ao tratamento da hipertensão arterial
Validación de contenido de las definiciones operacionales de la falta de aceptación al tratamiento de hipertensión
[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Borges, José Wicto Pereira
Moreira,Thereza Maria Magalhães
Rodrigues, Malvina Thaís Pacheco
Oliveira, Célida Juliana de

Abstract

Objective: to validate the content of the operational definitions of the construct "non-acceptance to hypertension treatment". Method: a methodological study of content validation. It was performed an integrative review that showed four dimensions of nonacceptance: person, disease/treatment, health ... mehr

Objective: to validate the content of the operational definitions of the construct "non-acceptance to hypertension treatment". Method: a methodological study of content validation. It was performed an integrative review that showed four dimensions of nonacceptance: person, disease/treatment, health care and environment. Thirty-six operational definitions were developed in the context of these dimensions. The settings were evaluated by a panel of 17 experts. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated for each operational definition, and the binomial test was performed. Results: among the 36 developed operational definitions, 20 were validated with excellent IVC (≥0,81) with p<0,005; 11 suffered adjustments and were re-evaluated, five were excluded. Conclusion: the design and validation of these operational definitions as a specific event of nursing contribute to the consolidation of attributes of concepts that ultimately foresee the demarcation of nursing science.... weniger

Thesaurusschlagwörter
Kreislaufkrankheit; Patient; Kooperation; Akzeptanz; ambulante Behandlung; Validierung; Gesundheitswesen; Lebenswelt

Klassifikation
Medizinsoziologie

Sprache Dokument
Englisch

Publikationsjahr
2016

Seitenangabe
S. 4651-4658

Zeitschriftentitel
Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online, 8 (2016) 3

DOI
https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2016.v8i3.4651-4658

ISSN
2175-5361

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.