dc.contributor.author | Shastitko, Andrei E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pavlova, Natalia S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T08:42:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T08:42:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2079-8555 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/51574 | |
dc.description.abstract | Stagnation of the Russian economy lends a new urgency to the question of whether reserves of competition incentives can be used to overcome the current negative economic tendencies. The lowering of entry barriers is traditionally considered a universal instrument of promoting competition. However, lower entry barriers can be mistakenly associated with bringing the market closer to the state of the so-called "perfect" competition. The authors aim to show that the absence of entry barriers does not improve competition in certain markets. On the contrary, it may result in a decrease in social welfare. This is particularly true of capital-intensive goods, for instance, large diameter pipes for gas pipelines. Lack of proper competition in such sectors of the market necessitates entry barriers, for they help to achieve a separating equilibrium at the market. Since there are costs associated with creating a separating equilibrium, it is necessary to assess both costs and benefits of the pooling and separating equilibria. | en |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject.ddc | Wirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Economics | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | Eintrittsbarriere; Gleichgewichtstrennung; Pooling | |
dc.title | Socially efficient entry barriers? | |
dc.title.alternative | Общественно-эффективные барьеры входа? | |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Baltic Region | |
dc.publisher.country | RUS | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | |
dc.subject.classoz | Volkswirtschaftstheorie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | National Economy | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Industrie- und Betriebssoziologie, Arbeitssoziologie, industrielle Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Sociology of Work, Industrial Sociology, Industrial Relations | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Russland | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Russia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Stagnation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | stagnation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wettbewerb | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | competition | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Industriepolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | industrial policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Markt | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | market | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51574-3 | |
dc.rights.licence | Digital Peer Publishing Licence - Freie DIPP-Lizenz | de |
dc.rights.licence | Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10053629 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057012 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10059136 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047904 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045641 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034440 | |
dc.type.stock | article | |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 26-38 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1090301 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10204 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 38 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 330 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-4-3 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 5 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.7 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |