Endnote export

 

%T Materialities of legal proceedings
%A Scheffer, Thomas
%J International Journal for Semiotics of Law
%N 4
%P 356-389
%V 17
%D 2004
%= 2008-07-10T10:07:00Z
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-5137
%U http://www.springerlink.com/content/q514uj45u96w11w3/fulltext.pdf
%X The author explores materialities as pre-established and co-producing
features of criminal proceedings. This is done by discussing courtrooms, files and
stories in relation to English Crown Court hearings. The three materialities gain
significance in the course of the court hearing, but do not derive from it. They exceed
the course of talk-in-court. Once the hearing started, the pre-established materialities
can be referred to but not simply modified. Materialities, in this line, provide stability
and guidance for the hearing. They facilitate, purify and condense it. However, their
temporal separation causes problems for those who run the show. Materialities can
be employed but not fully integrated. Unwelcome parts do, at times, disturb, disrupt
and complicate the current dealings.
%C NLD
%G en
%9 journal article
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info