Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKonopasek, Zdenekde
dc.contributor.authorKusa, Zuzanade
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-04T17:01:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:25:10Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:25:10Z
dc.date.issued2005de
dc.identifier.issn0172-6404
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/5021
dc.description.abstractIn the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the age of life history archives with a wider access for the social scientists is only coming. However, secondary analysis of qualitative data is not limited to documents that are stored in public archives. It happens quite often that researchers make use of an interview transcript, or a part of it, which has originally been gathered for a different occasion. Thus, they use these data for studying new topics that are sometimes far from the original research questions and objectives. In this paper we discuss some methodological problems arising from such practice. We show that, on one hand, the ethnomethodological perspective is especially demanding on the quality and the pinpoint accuracy of transcripts and the descriptions of the interviews by which the narratives were elicited (field memos). On the other hand, however, the ethnomethodological perspective orients scholars to formulate their research objectives according to what the data itself offers. The methodological problems related to the reuse of data can hardly be resolved in advance and on a general level.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.titleRe-use of life atories in an ethnomethodological researchen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalHistorical Social Researchde
dc.source.volume30de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozSocial History, Historical Social Researchen
dc.subject.classozSozialgeschichte, historische Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.thesozInterviewde
dc.subject.thesozsecondary analysisen
dc.subject.thesozBiographiede
dc.subject.thesozEthnomethodologiede
dc.subject.thesozSekundäranalysede
dc.subject.thesozinterviewen
dc.subject.thesozdataen
dc.subject.thesozbiographyen
dc.subject.thesozDatende
dc.subject.thesozethnomethodologyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-50217de
dc.date.modified2009-03-05T12:17:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10042848
internal.identifier.thesoz10035940
internal.identifier.thesoz10035502
internal.identifier.thesoz10037913
internal.identifier.thesoz10034708
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo54-72
internal.identifier.classoz30302
internal.identifier.journal152de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc900
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.30.2005.1.54-72
dc.subject.methodstheory formationen
dc.subject.methodsTheoriebildungde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.methods16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record