Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Chan
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-04T11:09:13Z
dc.date.available2017-01-04T11:09:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/49785
dc.description.abstract"This paper reports on a series of experiments to explore ways to use the technology of Web surveys to help respondents provide well-formed answers to questions that may be difficult to answer. Specifically, we focus on the use of drop-down or select lists and JavaScript lookup tables as alternatives to open text fields for the collection of information on prescription drugs. The first two experiments were conducted among members of opt-in panels in the U.S. The third experiment was conducted in the 2013 Health and Retirement Study Internet Survey. Respondents in each of the studies were randomly assigned to one of three input methods: text field, drop box, or JavaScript lookup, and asked to provide the names of prescription drugs they were taking. We compare both the quality of answers obtained using the three methods, and the effort (time) taken to provide such answers. We examine differences in performance on the three input format types by key respondent demographics and Internet experience. We discuss some of the technical challenges of implementing complex question types and offer some recommendations for the use of such tools in Web surveys." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherWeb survey; instrument design
dc.titleHelping respondents provide good answers in Web surveys
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume10
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozInternetde
dc.subject.thesozInterneten
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10040528
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticle
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo49-64
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i1.6273
dc.subject.methodsGrundlagenforschungde
dc.subject.methodsbasic researchen
dc.subject.methodsMethodenentwicklungde
dc.subject.methodsdevelopment of methodsen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.methods8
internal.identifier.methods11
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record