Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBarclay, Williamde
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T11:34:19Z
dc.date.available2016-06-21T11:34:19Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.issn1857-9760de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/47093
dc.description.abstractUnfortunately, modern liberals have long misrepresented and misused the foundational principles of liberalism, in order to claim that the fundamental function of every democratic state is the pursuit of its citizens’ liberty, as well as to viciously attack all states and leaders that do not consider liberty to be sacrosanct. Via an appeal to the essential works of liberalism and realism, this paper has thoroughly contradicted the claims of modern liberalism and has definitively argued that security, not liberty, is the fundamental purpose of every state. Furthermore, this paper has comprehensively analyzed the USA, in order to demonstrate that, if a state sacrifices the liberty of its citizenry in order to maintain its national security, then the state’s actions are not merely just and ethical vis-à-vis its citizenry, but, rather, fulfill the state’s fundamental, protective, function and are, in fact, an inevitable, benevolent, aspect of the state’s existence.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titleLiberty, security and the degenerative cycle of democracyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Liberty and International Affairs
dc.source.volume2de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozAllgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Politikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.classozBasic Research, General Concepts and History of Political Scienceen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical ideologyen
dc.subject.thesozrights of personal libertyen
dc.subject.thesozTocqueville, A.de
dc.subject.thesozLiberalismusde
dc.subject.thesozFreiheitde
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozsecurityen
dc.subject.thesozTocqueville, A.en
dc.subject.thesozliberalismen
dc.subject.thesozFreiheitsrechtde
dc.subject.thesozMontesquieuen
dc.subject.thesozMachiavelli, N.en
dc.subject.thesozLocke, J.de
dc.subject.thesozMachiavelli, N.de
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozLocke, J.en
dc.subject.thesozfreedomen
dc.subject.thesozMontesquieude
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitde
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Ideologiede
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-47093-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attributionen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10051308
internal.identifier.thesoz10038509
internal.identifier.thesoz10047013
internal.identifier.thesoz10052659
internal.identifier.thesoz10066249
internal.identifier.thesoz10036566
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10060297
internal.identifier.thesoz10051198
internal.identifier.thesoz10038508
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo60-74de
internal.identifier.classoz10501
internal.identifier.journal719
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence1
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record