Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorClarkson, Stephende
dc.contributor.editorClarkson, Stephende
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T11:07:14Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T11:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.issn1868-7601de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/45946
dc.description.abstractOf all the countries identified as rising powers on the world stage, Brazil appears to have drawn considerable economic and political strength from its engagement with various forms of regionalism during the expansionist years when Lula was president. Whether by helping create a local, intra-regional entity (Mercosul) or, later, proposing a continental one (UNASUL), Brasilia appeared to have the capacity to further its own economic and political interests by generating cooperative interactions with its smaller neighbors. Subsequently it took a leading role in inter-regional negotiations between Mercosul and the European Union in the global North and between Mercosul and ASEAN in the global South. More recently still, it spread its wings by associating trans-regionally with powers that are similarly dominant within their own regions – IBSA (India, Brazil, and South Africa) and BRICS (Russia, India, China, and South Africa) which shared with it a desire to play greater roles in the major institutions of global governance. While these new associations have their inner raisons d’être, belonging to them also bolsters Brazil’s weight in such traditional multilateral organizations as the United Nations and the WTO which were previously dominated by the US-Europe-Japan triad. This working paper assesses the relative importance of these different regionalisms in Brazil’s emergence on the global stage by counterposing them with such standard explanations of a state’s global significance as its military might, economic strength, and its soft-power influence overseas. We identify how various regionalisms interact with traditional bilateral and multilateral relations in helping or hindering Brazil in its global ascent. We conclude to our surprise that regionalism has only played a minimally positive role economically. Even politically, it has on occasion become more hindrance than help in boosting Brazil into its current orbit - as its announced intention to negotiate separately with the EU suggests.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherUNASUR; Transregionalism; Regional Governancede
dc.titlePrimary or secondary? Regionalism's multiple roles in Brazil's international emergencede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.volume69de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesKFG Working Paper Series
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozBrasiliende
dc.subject.thesozBrazilen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftsentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic development (on national level)en
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational economic relationsen
dc.subject.thesozwirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic cooperationen
dc.subject.thesozbilaterale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozbilateral relationsen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational relationsen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozMERCOSURde
dc.subject.thesozMERCOSURen
dc.subject.thesozregionale Integrationde
dc.subject.thesozregional integrationen
dc.subject.thesozwirtschaftliche Integrationde
dc.subject.thesozeconomic integrationen
dc.subject.thesozRegionalismusde
dc.subject.thesozregionalismen
dc.subject.thesozGlobal Governancede
dc.subject.thesozglobal governanceen
dc.subject.thesozSchwellenlandde
dc.subject.thesoznewly industrializing countriesen
dc.subject.thesozSüdamerikade
dc.subject.thesozSouth Americaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-459467
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10039751
internal.identifier.thesoz10040626
internal.identifier.thesoz10037393
internal.identifier.thesoz10049759
internal.identifier.thesoz10039288
internal.identifier.thesoz10037331
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10044173
internal.identifier.thesoz10047622
internal.identifier.thesoz10038303
internal.identifier.thesoz10056432
internal.identifier.thesoz10047855
internal.identifier.thesoz10057575
internal.identifier.thesoz10035556
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo39de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorFreie Universität Berlin, FB Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften, Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft Kolleg-Forschergruppe "The Transformative Power of Europe"
internal.identifier.corporateeditor558
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.identifier.series808
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record