Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKolenikov, Stanislavde
dc.contributor.authorHammer, Heatherde
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T14:35:05Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T14:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/45406
dc.description.abstract"This paper discusses the problem of creating general purpose calibrated survey weights when the control totals data exist at different levels of aggregation, such as households and individuals. We present and compare three different methods. The first does the weighting in two stages, using only the household data, and then only the individual data. The second redefines targets at the individual level, if possible, and uses these targets to calibrate only the individual level weights. The third uses multipliers of household size to produce household level weights that simultaneously calibrate to the individual level totals. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, including control total data accessibility and available software from the perspective a survey statistician working outside of a national statistical organization. We conclude by outlining directions for further research." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.othercalibration; rakingde
dc.titleSimultaneous Raking of Survey Weights at Multiple Levelsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozsimulationen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozprivate householden
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozMethodenvergleichde
dc.subject.thesozweightingen
dc.subject.thesozcomparison of methodsen
dc.subject.thesozSimulationde
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozGewichtungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozPrivathaushaltde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Worksen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10052208
internal.identifier.thesoz10035966
internal.identifier.thesoz10045727
internal.identifier.thesoz10037865
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicWeighting: Practical Issues and 'How to' Approachde
dc.source.issuetopicWeighting: Practical Issues and ‘How to’ Approach
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2015-00010de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence2
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record