Show simple item record

Ein face-to-face Haushaltspanel online: Effekte eines gemischten Designs auf item- und unit-nonresponse
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJäckle, Annettede
dc.contributor.authorLynn, Peterde
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Jonde
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-22T11:08:42Z
dc.date.available2015-09-22T11:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44705
dc.description.abstract"There are considerable cost and timeliness advantages associated with web interviewing, compared to interviewer administration. However, web surveys do not perform well in terms of coverage and participation. To harness the strengths of both modes, existing probability-based interviewer-administered surveys are therefore being pushed to consider a mixed mode approach, including web. We assess the effect of introducing web interviewing as part of a mixed-mode design in the context of an existing longitudinal survey in which sample members have previously been interviewed face-to-face. Using experimental data from a household panel survey in the UK, we find that the mixed mode design resulted in a lower proportion of households fully responding. However, more than one in five households fully responded online. Overall, individual response rates were also lower with the mixed mode design, and we were unable to identify any subgroups where the reverse was true. Also, item nonresponse rates were higher with the mixed mode design." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.othermixed mode survey; respondent incentivesde
dc.titleGoing online with a face-to-face household panel: effects of a mixed mode design on item and unit non-responsede
dc.title.alternativeEin face-to-face Haushaltspanel online: Effekte eines gemischten Designs auf item- und unit-nonresponsede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozInterviewde
dc.subject.thesozinterviewen
dc.subject.thesozPanelde
dc.subject.thesozpanelen
dc.subject.thesozLängsschnittuntersuchungde
dc.subject.thesozlongitudinal studyen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037913
internal.identifier.thesoz10054018
internal.identifier.thesoz10050423
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo57-70de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record