Show simple item record

Positive, negative und bipolare Fragen: der Effekt der Polarität von Fragen auf die Beurteilung der Lesbarkeit von Texten
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKamoen, Naomide
dc.contributor.authorHolleman, Bregjede
dc.contributor.authorBergh, Huub van dende
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Tedde
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-20T10:38:28Z
dc.date.available2015-08-20T10:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2013de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44286
dc.description.abstract"For decades, survey researchers have known that respondents give different answers to attitude questions worded positively (X is good. Agree-Disagree), negatively (X is bad. Agree-Disagree) or on a bipolar scale (X is bad-good). This makes survey answers hard to interpret, especially since findings on exactly how the answers are affected are conflicting. In the current paper, we present twelve studies in which the effect of question polarity was measured for a set of thirteen contrastive adjectives. In each study, the same adjectives were used so the generalizability of wording effects across studies could be examined for each word pair. Results show that for five of the word pairs an effect of question wording can be generalized. The direction of these effects are largely consistent: respondents generally give the same answers to positive and bipolar questions, but they are more likely to disagree with negative questions than to agree with positive questions or to choose the positive side of the bipolar scale. In other words, respondents express their opinions more positively when the question is worded negatively. Even though answers to the three wording alternatives sometimes differ, results also show that reliable answers can be obtained with all three wording alternatives. So, for survey practice, these results suggest that all three wording alternatives may be used for attitude measurement." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titlePositive, negative, and bipolar questions: the effect of question polarity on ratings of text readabilityde
dc.title.alternativePositive, negative und bipolare Fragen: der Effekt der Polarität von Fragen auf die Beurteilung der Lesbarkeit von Textende
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo181-189de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i3.5034de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00605464de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record