dc.contributor.author | Hox, Joop | de |
dc.contributor.author | Schoot, Rens van de | de |
dc.contributor.author | Matthijsse, Suzette | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-13T15:02:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-13T15:02:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1864-3361 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44227 | |
dc.description.abstract | "Meuleman and Billiet (2009) have carried out a simulation study aimed at the question how many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM estimation in comparative studies. The authors concluded that a sample of 50 to 100 countries is needed for accurate estimation. Recently, Bayesian estimation methods have been introduced in structural equation modeling which should work well with much lower sample sizes. The current study reanalyzes the simulation of Meuleman and Billiet using Bayesian estimation to find the lowest number of countries needed when conducting multilevel SEM. The main result of our simulations is that a sample of about 20 countries is sufficient for accurate Bayesian estimation, which makes multilevel SEM practicable for the number of countries commonly available in large scale comparative surveys." (author's abstract) | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.title | How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective | de |
dc.title.alternative | Wie wenige Länder werden es machen? Eine vergleichende Studie | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Research Methods | |
dc.source.volume | 6 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datendokumentation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data organization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | data | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Schätzung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data collection method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | comparative research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datenorganisation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | estimation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | vergleichende Forschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Daten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data documentation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Erhebungsmethode | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036452 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10068092 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040537 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040555 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037921 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034708 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057146 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 87-93 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 674 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Theory of human values | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2012.v6i2.5033 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.description.misc | gesis-solis-00581809 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |